No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

29 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 30, 2014

    Barnes v. Foster Wheeler Corp. (2014)

    The district court granted General Electric's motion for summary judgment and dismissed all claims against GE with prejudice, because plaintiffs offered no admissible evidence that Barnes was exposed to an asbestos product made or supplied…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 18, 2019

    Babcock v. CBS Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    The court granted defendants CBS and General Electric's motion to compel nonparty Memorial Sloan Kettering to produce Arnold Babcock's original pathology materials, denied the hospital's cross-motion for a protective order, and denied…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 25, 2010

    Miranda v. Abex Corp. (2010)

    Four plaintiffs, Ernesto Miranda, Antonio DiBenedetto, Lutz Sommer and Gordon Cheney, sued Abex Corporation and other companies in New York County. They alleged they had mesothelioma from asbestos exposure, and two of the four had died. Miranda and…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015

    Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    The court granted summary judgment to Crown Cork & Seal, CBS, General Electric, Gardner Denver, Link-Belt and Riley Power, and denied it to Crane Co. and John Crane, Inc. on the maritime claims, so the Heddens…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Wyoming · April 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust (2014)

    "Under general conflict of laws principles, where the laws of the two jurisdictions would produce the same result on the particular issue presented, there is a \false conflict,' and the \[c\]ourt should avoid the choice…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · February 15, 2022 · in the opinion

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2022)

    Nevertheless, there are two exceptions to the general rule of nonliability—the \retained control' exception and the \peculiar risk' exception. Plaintiff argues that both exceptions apply, or at least that there are genuine disputes of material…

  7. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 27, 2017

    McCarthy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    The Superior Court denied the motions for summary judgment of Warren Pumps, Gardner Denver and General Electric, ruling that the decedent's pre-suit sworn statement was admissible and that plaintiff showed enough product identification to…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …from asbestos exposure. His work history included the Navy, the Air Force, General Electric, Stone and Webster, and automotive work. The claim against Yuba concerned his work from 1977 to 1981 on the construction of the…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · April 26, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    Carl Gay developed mesothelioma, diagnosed in June 2019, and died in April 2020. His daughter, Allisa Gay, as executor of his estate, sued Gardner Denver and other manufacturers and distributors. She alleged he was exposed to asbestos in Gardner…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · April 26, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …was diagnosed in June 2019 and died in April 2020. His work history included the Navy, the Air Force, General Electric, Stone and Webster, and automotive work. The claim against Hunter Sales concerned gaskets at the…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Wyoming · April 7, 2014

    Johnson v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. Prod. Liab. Trust (2014)

    The district court granted summary judgment to Gardner Denver, Bechtel, FMC, CBS (Westinghouse's successor) and General Electric, ruling against the estate of H. Paul Johnson, because no evidence tied any of their asbestos to him…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …law, a plaintiff must show exposure to the defendant's product and that it was a substantial factor in causing the injury. A general recollection of a product's name, its presence on a ship, or…

  13. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · October 14, 2010

    Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Pittman (2010)

    Lonnie Pittman was named as a plaintiff in a December 2002 asbestos suit against many companies. Defendants later learned he had died in March 2001, almost two years before the suit was filed. His widow, Mary Pittman, was substituted as plaintiff…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    Darlene Data sued many companies in her own right and as executrix of her husband Michael Data's estate. Mr. Data served in the Navy aboard the USS Newport News from 1969 to 1973. He later worked at Mesta Machine and then at the West Pittsburgh…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Ruppel v. AO Smith Corporation (2012)

    …Pumps and Peerless Pumps; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., individually and as successor-in-interest to C.H. Wheeler; Garden Denver, Inc.; General Electric Co.; Georgia-Pacific, LLC; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Honeywell International Inc., as successor-in…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. American Standard, Inc. (2009)

    …difficult if not impossible, is irrelevant to the determination whether the forum is suitable unless \the alternative forum provides no remedy at all.' \[Citations.\]" (Guimei v. General Electric Co. (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 689, 696.)…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Friedman v. AO Smith Corp. (2013)

    …breakers, as well as specialty and explosion-proof equipment. Among other things, Mr. Friedman testified that he purchased electrical supplies and equipment from Graybar. In this regard, Mr. Friedman testified as follows (plaintiffs' exhibit B, pp…

  18. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. AO Smith Corporation (2016)

    …CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, F/K/A VIACOM INC., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CBS CORPORATION, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, F/K/A WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; CHAMPLAIN CABLE CORPORATION, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO HERCULES INC; COLUMBUS MCKINNON…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 2017 · in the opinion

    Macaluso v. A.O. Smith Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …rock, floor tiles, and electrical equipment), and also while employed as a plumber's helper (from boilers and boiler insulation) during the period 1972 to 1982. Eugene Story-(deceased) Was exposed to Asbestos dust from valves…