No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 22, 2019

    Berry v. Anco Insulations (2019)

    …West Monroe wife of mill electrical and instrumentation technician who laundered his work clothes West Monroe Paper Mill West Monroe 1961-2010; wife of mill electrical and instrumentation technician who laundered his work clothes West Monroe…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 15, 2017 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation Evans v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2017)

    …Allison L. Texter, Swartz Campbell LLC. Gardner Denver Inc., Defendant, represented by Krista Reale Samis, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · February 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bray v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (2015)

    …24 (Crane); 84:6-24 (same). He was able to recall only the brands Westinghouse and General Electric without prompting. Choate was prompted to describe certain elements of the products he recalled, such as their label…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 23, 2013

    Fischer v. Aerco Intl., Inc. (2013)

    …1950 to 1954 he worked as a civilian draftsman at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, designing radar and electrical installations aboard several Navy ships. He said pumps were everywhere on the ships and that workers repaired them…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 30, 2020 · in the opinion

    Pruitt v. Amdura (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    Pruitt perform general maintenance on these pumps every one to two months, which required removing and replacing gaskets and packing material. (Id.) Mr. Dumas further testified that Mr. Pruitt's maintenance work took two to three…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Flowserve US Inc. (2017)

    …must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…