No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

94 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 5

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 1998

    Re' v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    Diana Re' sued Owens-Corning, Garlock, W.R. Grace, Flintkote and others in Orleans Parish. She alleged she developed mesothelioma from asbestos dust carried home on her father's work clothes during her childhood, from 1963…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 13, 1995

    Higgins v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The Appellate Division reversed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and remanded for a new trial in favor of plaintiff Higgins, and dismissed Owens-Corning's cross appeal on the medical monitoring award as moot. A…

  3. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995

    Schiavo v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The Appellate Division affirmed the compensatory and punitive damage awards against Owens-Corning in favor of the Schiavo plaintiffs, finding the Saranac document error harmless given the small punitive award. A 'day in the life' videotape…

  4. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 24, 2000

    Carroll v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …s lung cancer claim was not time-barred, which favors the plaintiff over the asbestos defendants (Owens-Corning and others). Asbestosis and lung cancer are separate and distinct diseases, so a cause of action for lung…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 9, 1981

    Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1981)

    …Keene, Armstrong Cork, Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois and the third-party defendants, holding that the Wisconsin limitations period runs from the plaintiff's last exposure to any asbestos-containing product, and it set a schedule for…

  6. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995

    Ripa v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The appellate court affirmed liability and compensatory damages for plaintiff Pauline Ripa against Owens-Corning, but cut Owens-Corning's share to thirty percent and reversed the $5.5 million punitive award, remanding for a new…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990

    Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)

    Six longtime workers at the E.I. du Pont plant in Clinton, Iowa, and their wives sued makers of asbestos insulation products. The workers said they were exposed through insulation on pipes and boilers, and in some cases through cleaning out machine…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 31, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Baltimore City (1996)

    The Court of Special Appeals reversed the $2,600,000 punitive damages award against Owens-Corning for lack of proof of actual knowledge, affirmed the compensatory award for the City of Baltimore, and rejected the juror…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · February 27, 1989

    Fisher v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1989)

    Charles Fisher and his wife sued several asbestos product companies in 1985, claiming his exposure to asbestos had caused asbestosis, cancer, and possibly mesothelioma. The parties settled for $60,000, and the Fishers signed a release of all claims,…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 2, 2004

    Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2004)

    Wesley Roberts, Jr., a pipefitter from 1941 to 1981, was exposed to asbestos-containing products at the Exxon refinery in Baton Rouge and other sites. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 1994 and died in 1995. He and his wife sued many…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 20, 1981

    Carbonaro v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

    The federal court granted Owens-Corning Fiberglas's motion for summary judgment, holding the plaintiffs' asbestos suit barred by the prior state-court judgment for the defendants, so the plaintiffs lost. Under claim preclusion, a final…

  12. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998

    Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)

    The court affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Kaylo insulation) and Rock Wool (One Shot cement), reversed the judgments against Garlock, A.W. Chesterton and Flexitallic, affirmed the judgments against Abadie…

  13. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · August 1, 1989

    Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1989)

    Roger Mauro and his wife sued several asbestos product makers. Mauro had worked as a repairman and then a plumber-steamfitter at Ancora State Psychiatric Hospital from 1964 into the late 1970s. He tore out old insulation and installed new, using or…

  14. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 6, 1996

    Viereck v. Fibreboard Corp. (1996)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment on the jury verdict for Virgil Viereck's estate and his wife Julia Viereck against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that pre-WPLA law applied and that the evidentiary rulings…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995

    Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)

    …judgment for plaintiff Sarah Kirk against Owens-Corning and remanded for a new trial on damages and liability, because the district court refused to strike two biased jurors for cause, impairing Owens-Corning's peremptory challenges…

  16. Court case · North Carolina Supreme Court · November 5, 1985

    Wilder v. Amatex Corp. (1985)

    The North Carolina Supreme Court reversed the summary judgments for Owens-Corning and for the other defendant appellees, ruling for plaintiff J.W. Wilder against Owens-Corning, Eagle-Picher, Pittsburgh Corning, Celotex, Keene and Starr-Davis…

  17. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 20, 1994

    Quick v. Murphy Oil Co. (1994)

    The appeals court reversed the $46,000 contribution judgment that the trial court had entered for Owens Corning Fiberglas against Garlock, because Quick's exposure to Garlock's asbestos products was trivial and not a cause…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995

    Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)

    The court granted summary judgment to Pittsburgh Corning, Owens-Corning, Anchor Packing and Garlock, and in part to Georgia-Pacific (for Bestwall). It denied it to John Crane, to Georgia-Pacific on its joint compound, and…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · November 6, 1992

    Tragarz v. Keene Corp. (1992)

    The Seventh Circuit affirmed the $3,000,000 judgment for Grace Tragarz against Keene and Owens-Corning Fiberglas, but reversed the denial of Keene's request to file a contribution cross-claim against OCF and remanded…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · July 2, 1990

    White v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    Dorothy White, widow of Edward White, and their son Douglas sued Celotex and many other asbestos product makers and sellers in Arizona state court over Edward's death. The defendants removed the case to federal court. According to the family's…