No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

13 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 22, 2010

    Adamson v. General Elec. Co. (2010)

    …Garlock, CBS/Westinghouse, General Electric and Union Carbide (no proof of exposure to their asbestos products), against the estate's executor. To survive summary judgment, a plaintiff must present evidence that the defendant's asbestos-containing…

  2. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · December 16, 2010

    Certainteed Corporation v. Dexter (2010)

    …Premises Owner Liability; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Electric plant (Mount Vernon), Mount Vernon pipefitter General Electric plant (Mount Vernon) Mount Vernon 1969-1971; pipefitter 1963-1964; pipefitter 1946-1984

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · July 16, 2020

    Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2020)

    Charles Corley and his wife Myra sued dozens of companies that allegedly supplied asbestos-containing products that caused his malignant mesothelioma. The opinion says he used the products in the Navy and later as a self-employed mechanic and…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2010)

    …Elliot Turbomachinery Co., 545 F.Supp.2d 1266, 1273 (S.D.Fla.2008) (citing Nesbiet v. General Electric Co., 399 F.Supp.2d 205, 212 (S.D.N.Y.2005)). Although these arguments may undermine the…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 22, 2011 · in the opinion

    Sabol v. Allied Glove Corp. (2011)

    …Argo Packing Company, Beazer East, Inc., CBS Corporation, Coppus Turbines, Durabla Manufacturing, Easton Corporation, Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, General Electric Company, George V. Hamilton, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand Corporation, I.U. North America, Inc.…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 7, 2009 · in the opinion

    Boudreaux v. Able Supply Co. (2009)

    …Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere and Denegre, LLP, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, [\1266] CBS Corporation and General Electric Corporation. Alan K. Breaud, Breaud & Meyers, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant/Appellee, Omega Protein, Inc. Forrest Ron Wilkes…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …and found that it contained asbestos. Dr. Longo's testing of the gaskets involved using a wire brush or an electric wire brush to clean a flange surface. The measuring equipment revealed that significant amounts of…

  8. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 10, 2014 · in the opinion

    In re Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (2014)

    …Two studies of exposure to asbestos specifically from gasket removal work are inconclusive at best. There is a great deal of peer-reviewed scientific literature relating to asbestos exposure in general, with varying degrees of reliability…

  9. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 4, 2005 · in the opinion

    Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Little (2005)

    …Commonwealth, 253 Va. 180, 182, 482 S.E.2d 810, 811-12 (1997); Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co., 244 Va. 152, 156, 419 S.E.2d 637, 640 (1992) (citing East River S.S. Corp…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2011 · in the opinion

    Moeller v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (2011)

    …creates "\such a risk' of an accident of the general nature of the one in question \that an ordinarily prudent company engaged in the manufacture' of such a product \would not have put it on the…

  11. Court case · Utah Supreme Court · December 12, 2008 · in the opinion

    Kilpatrick v. Bullough Abatement, Inc. (2008)

    …1989) ("But where general terms follow specific ones, the rules of construction, including noscitur a sociis, \it is known from its associates,' and ejusdem generis, \of the same kind,' require that the general terms be given…

  12. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 18, 2011 · in the opinion

    Yankee v. APV North America, Inc. (2011)

    …We hold that the general rule that there is no duty under common law products liability or negligence principles to warn of the dangers of exposure to asbestos in other manufacturers' products applies with regard to…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion

    Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)

    …a plaintiff is no longer required to show substantial exposure. The Stark opinion and general logic may suggest that, where an expert witness can testify unequivocally that a defendant's product was the source of the…