18 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 22, 2010
Adamson v. General Elec. Co. (2010)
…Garlock, CBS/Westinghouse, General Electric and Union Carbide (no proof of exposure to their asbestos products), against the estate's executor. To survive summary judgment, a plaintiff must present evidence that the defendant's asbestos-containing…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · December 16, 2010
Certainteed Corporation v. Dexter (2010)
…Premises Owner Liability; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Electric plant (Mount Vernon), Mount Vernon pipefitter General Electric plant (Mount Vernon) Mount Vernon 1969-1971; pipefitter 1963-1964; pipefitter 1946-1984
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · July 16, 2020
Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2020)
Charles Corley and his wife Myra sued dozens of companies that allegedly supplied asbestos-containing products that caused his malignant mesothelioma. The opinion says he used the products in the Navy and later as a self-employed mechanic and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion
Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2010)
…Elliot Turbomachinery Co., 545 F.Supp.2d 1266, 1273 (S.D.Fla.2008) (citing Nesbiet v. General Electric Co., 399 F.Supp.2d 205, 212 (S.D.N.Y.2005)). Although these arguments may undermine the…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 22, 2011 · in the opinion
Sabol v. Allied Glove Corp. (2011)
…Argo Packing Company, Beazer East, Inc., CBS Corporation, Coppus Turbines, Durabla Manufacturing, Easton Corporation, Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, General Electric Company, George V. Hamilton, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand Corporation, I.U. North America, Inc.…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 7, 2009 · in the opinion
Boudreaux v. Able Supply Co. (2009)
…Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere and Denegre, LLP, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, [\1266] CBS Corporation and General Electric Corporation. Alan K. Breaud, Breaud & Meyers, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant/Appellee, Omega Protein, Inc. Forrest Ron Wilkes…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)
…and found that it contained asbestos. Dr. Longo's testing of the gaskets involved using a wire brush or an electric wire brush to clean a flange surface. The measuring equipment revealed that significant amounts of…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 10, 2014 · in the opinion
In re Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (2014)
…Two studies of exposure to asbestos specifically from gasket removal work are inconclusive at best. There is a great deal of peer-reviewed scientific literature relating to asbestos exposure in general, with varying degrees of reliability…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 4, 2005 · in the opinion
Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Little (2005)
…Commonwealth, 253 Va. 180, 182, 482 S.E.2d 810, 811-12 (1997); Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co., 244 Va. 152, 156, 419 S.E.2d 637, 640 (1992) (citing East River S.S. Corp…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · July 20, 2001 · in the opinion
Black v. ACandS, Inc. (2001)
…concluded that the plaintiff in McIntosh was not entitled to a remedy under Section 12 because "the General Assembly has determined that injuries occurring ten years after the product was delivered to a user are not…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2011 · in the opinion
Moeller v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (2011)
…creates "\such a risk' of an accident of the general nature of the one in question \that an ordinarily prudent company engaged in the manufacture' of such a product \would not have put it on the…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · April 26, 1999 · in the opinion
Holmes v. ACandS, Inc. (1999)
…year discovery based statute of limitations applicable to product liability claims. The comprehensiveness of the medical malpractice act is evidence of the legislature's intent that it should prevail over the more general wrongful death statute…
-
Court case · Utah Supreme Court · December 12, 2008 · in the opinion
Kilpatrick v. Bullough Abatement, Inc. (2008)
…1989) ("But where general terms follow specific ones, the rules of construction, including noscitur a sociis, \it is known from its associates,' and ejusdem generis, \of the same kind,' require that the general terms be given…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Yankee v. APV North America, Inc. (2011)
…We hold that the general rule that there is no duty under common law products liability or negligence principles to warn of the dangers of exposure to asbestos in other manufacturers' products applies with regard to…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 10, 2002 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2002)
…1995), trans. denied. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within ten years after the delivery of the product to the initial user or consumer…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 30, 1999 · in the opinion
Porter Hayden Company v. Wyche (1999)
…to the earliest diagnosis, from adenocarcinoma is 13.2 years." Although Porter Hayden seems to take issue in its reply brief with the use of general epidemiological testimony to draw inferences in specific cases, in Grimshaw…
-
Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)
…was proximately caused by his exposure to asbestos-containing products provided by the Defendants. The Indiana General Assembly has enacted two statutes that limit the period of time within which individuals can file product liability claims…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)
…a plaintiff is no longer required to show substantial exposure. The Stark opinion and general logic may suggest that, where an expert witness can testify unequivocally that a defendant's product was the source of the…