- Organization: Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC
- Organization: Maryland Casualty Company
- Clear filters
17 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022
Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)
Felton Robichaux sued Avondale (Huntington Ingalls) and many other companies in Louisiana state court, alleging he developed mesothelioma, diagnosed in January 2022, from asbestos exposure. He alleged he worked at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022
Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)
Felton Robichaux sued Huntington Ingalls (Avondale) and many other defendants in Louisiana state court. He alleged he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to 1979 as a carpenter and insulator.…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion
Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)
\[1\] The Complaint named as Defendants: Cardinal Industrial Insulation Company, Inc.; Triangle Insulation and Sheetmetal Co.; General Electric Company; ACandS Inc.; Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC; Anchor Packing; John Crane, Inc.; Combustion Engineering, Inc.; RapidA-merican Corporation…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 27, 2005
DeMeyer v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (Matter of Asbestos Litig, 2005)
…York applies the Frye general acceptance standard rather than Daubert; once the challenger makes a prima facie showing that an expert's methodology is not generally accepted, the proponent must prove general acceptance by a fair…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 29, 2015
Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2015)
…of asbestos knowledge, the Walsh-Healey Act, specific risk percentages, life expectancy, and general symptoms and quality of life, plus an unlisted 1956 article. It also struck his rebuttal report to Dr. Stockman. It kept the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · June 12, 2017 · in the opinion
In re Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2017)
General Overview of the Debtors GST, a North Carolina limited liability company, and Garrison, a North Carolina corporation, were wholly owned subsidiaries of Coltec Industries Inc at the time GST and Garrison filed their Chapter 11…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 30, 2012 · in the opinion
In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)
\[131\] There are two exceptions to the general rule that would allow creditors to proceed against the debtor for the post-petition interest: (1) when a creditor is oversecured under § 506(b); and (2) under § 726…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 11, 2012 · in the opinion
In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)
Moreover, the General Growth Properties Court relied on several equitable considerations in arriving at its decision, including that the default rate would not constitute a "penalty" to the "exceedingly solvent" debtor, a lack of misconduct, and…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · September 12, 1991
Mitchell, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty (1991)
…the insured, was entitled to a defense and indemnity because coverage is triggered at least by exposure to its asbestos products during the policy period. Under a standard form comprehensive general liability policy, "bodily injury" from…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)
…they function together. This finding is supported by evidence of record, including testimony cited by Mt. McKinley which established that Corning's General Counsel and Rule 30(b)(6) witness, Vincent P. Hatton, could not specify…
-
Court case · Montana Supreme Court · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion
Maryland Cas. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Court (2020)
…and through it, the general public." He expressed particular concern the Mill workers' union or local attorneys could become aware of the scope of the lung damage issues at the Mill. ¶76 Larrick also informed Hopkins…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion
Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)
…INSURANCE LAW—INDEMNITY—COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY POLICIES—APPORTIONMENT—PRO RATA—TRIGGER OF COVERAGE—INJURY-IN-FACT TRIGGER—CONTINUOUS TRIGGER The Court of Appeals held that damages from a continuous bodily injury judgment must be allocated on…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion
Motions for Access OF Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2013)
…regardless of their motive for inspecting such records. Thus, the press has no greater right of access than does the general public, and more importantly, an intervenor who is also a litigant in a collateral proceeding…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 27, 2007 · in the opinion
Reynolds v. Garlock Sealing Technologies (Mtr OF Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litigation, 2007)
…441, 444 \[Utah 1989\]; Ratterree v Bartlett, 238 Kan 11, 29, 707 P2d 1063, 1076 \[1985\]; General Motors Corp. v Lahocki, 286 Md 714, 723-733, 410 A2d 1039, 1044-1048 \[1980\]; Ward v Ochoa, 284…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · July 23, 2014 · in the opinion
Legal Newsline v. Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2014)
…to "state the reasons for its decision to seal supported by specific findings, and the reasons for rejecting alternatives to sealing to provide this court with sufficient information for meaningful appellate review." Media General Operations, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 17, 2014 · in the opinion
Morvant v. Maryland Casualty Company (2014)
…2010) (Duval, J.). In RepublicBank, the Fifth Circuit considered state and federal actions involving the same general subject matter and sharing a common issue, the validity of a promissory note. 828 F.2d at 1121. The…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Motions for Access OF Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2013)
…regardless of their motive for inspecting such records. Thus, the press has no greater right of access than does the general public, and more importantly, an intervenor who is also a litigant in a collateral proceeding…