No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)

    …Corp., 667 F.Supp. 1523, 1538 (S.D. Ga. 1983) (endeavoring to provide guidance "carefully, methodically and with an eye toward practical solutions"); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 138 N.J. 437, 477-78…

  2. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)

    … Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America, supra, 667 F.2d 1044 n.19, 1047 n.25; Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., supra, 138 N.J. 457. For these reasons, we are persuaded…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 1, 2013

    Motions for Access OF Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2013)

    Garlock Sealing Technologies, a maker of sealing products, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in North Carolina in 2010 to set up a trust for current and future asbestos claims. To prepare for a trial estimating its mesothelioma liability, it asked the…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 11, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)

    …Pa. 138, 842 A.2d 919 (2004). Babcock & Wilcox February 2000 Pittsburgh Corning April 2000 Owens Corning October 2000 Armstrong World December 2000 Industries G-I Holdings January 2001 W.R. Grace April 2001 U.S…

  5. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)

    …respect to negligence. Inclusion of Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. Norris argues that the trial court committed reversible error by including Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. We disagree. In Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  6. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion

    In re Motions for Access OF Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2013)

    …Bankr. P. 2019, dated October 22, 2004, entered in Owens (see D.I. 3, Owens ROA, Tab 1 at 2-3) (emphasis added)); see also D.I. 18, Garlock App., Tab 2 (same)) This procedural framework…

  7. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)

    …discovery response marked as Exhibit 203 identifies ten bankrupt entities, including Armstrong, Babcock & Wilcox, Fibreboard, Owens Corning, USG, and others. See Garlock Exhibit 203 at 7-30. To the extent that Garlock offered these documents to…

  8. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion

    In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)

    …discovery response marked as Exhibit 203 identifies 10 bankrupt entities, including Armstrong, Babcock & Wilcox, Fibreboard, Owens Corning, USG, and others. See Garlock Exhibit 203 at 7-30. To the extent that Garlock offered these documents to…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Mt. McKinley Ins. Co. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (2014)

    …553, 652 A.2d 948, 951 (1995). Should either PPG or Corning breach a contractual duty it owes under the policies, Mt. McKinley may assert that as a defense in coverage litigation. Neither PPG nor Corning…

  10. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)

    … 105 injunction restraining creditors from proceeding against non-debtors may be appropriate: when the non-debtor owns assets which will either be a source of funds for the debtor or when the preservation of the non…