10 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 24, 1979
Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia Materials Co. (1979)
Edwin Nolan worked as an asbestos insulator from 1941 until May 1973, applying asbestos and fiberglass pipe coverings and related materials. He sued several makers and sellers of those products, alleging defective products and failure to…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · April 26, 1999
Holmes v. ACandS, Inc. (1999)
Ivay Holmes sued on her own behalf and as personal representative of her husband Henry's estate after he died of lung cancer caused by asbestos exposure. Henry was diagnosed around June 20, 1994, and died about a month later, on July 22, 1994. She…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion
Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)
…respect to negligence. Inclusion of Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. Norris argues that the trial court committed reversible error by including Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. We disagree. In Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 11, 2012 · in the opinion
In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)
…including the Armstrong World Industries Asbestos PI Trust, the United States Gypsum Asbestos PI Trust, two Owens Corning Fiberglass/Fibreboard trusts, and the Babcock and Wilcox Company Trust. (See Payments to Garlock on Indirect Claims as…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion
Motions for Access OF Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2013)
…directly and adversely affected pecuniarily by an order or decree of the bankruptcy court," and prior litigation involving requests for access to Rule 2019 information in connection with asbestos-related bankruptcies. Pittsburgh Corning, 260 Fed.Appx…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)
…Pittsburgh Corning allegedly had responsibility. See Garlock Exhibits 121, 132 165, 167, 178, 174, and 203. For example, the discovery response marked as Exhibit 203 identifies ten bankrupt entities, including Armstrong, Babcock & Wilcox, Fibreboard, Owens Corning…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)
…Pittsburgh Corning allegedly had responsibility. See Garlock Exhibits 121, 132 165, 167, 178, 174, and 203. For example, the discovery response marked as Exhibit 203 identifies 10 bankrupt entities, including Armstrong, Babcock & Wilcox, Fibreboard, Owens Corning…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Motions for Access OF Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2013)
…etal. ("Kaiser"), Bankr. Case No. 02-10429 (JKF) (D.I. 10166 & 10167); (vi) In re Owens Corning ("Owens"), Bankr. Case No. 00-03837 (JKF) (D.I. 21027 & 21028); (vii) In re United States Mineral Products Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Mt. McKinley Ins. Co. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (2014)
…951 (1995). Should either PPG or Corning breach a contractual duty it owes under the policies, Mt. McKinley may assert that as a defense in coverage litigation. Neither PPG nor Corning may claim that § 6.5…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)
…times, (4) PPG and PCC have joint insurance coverage, (5) PPG permitted PCC to participate in its insurance coverage program, and (6) provided certain services to PCC." In re Pittsburgh Corning, 417 B.R. at 296…