18 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion
Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)
\[1\] The Complaint named as Defendants: Cardinal Industrial Insulation Company, Inc.; Triangle Insulation and Sheetmetal Co.; General Electric Company; ACandS Inc.; Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC; Anchor Packing; John Crane, Inc.; Combustion Engineering, Inc.; RapidA-merican Corporation…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 2, 2004 · in the opinion
Torrejon v. Mobil Oil Co. (2004)
…Torrejon was uncertain as to the length of time he was there. • General Electric — worked on boilers and turbines and the heating and cooling system. • Colonial House (a hotel) in Las Vegas — 1959 to early 1960…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 16, 1991 · in the opinion
Fibreboard Corp. v. Pool (1991)
…1969). Quantifying probability, it means a more than fifty percent chance. See Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Underwriters v. Gary Douglas Electric, 48 Ohio App.2d 319, 357 N.E.2d 388, 392 (1974). Dr. J.D. Britton…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 1998 · in the opinion
Re' v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)
…J., dissents with reasons. BYRNES, Judge, dissenting with reasons. When the Louisiana Supreme Court in Jordan v. Central Louisiana Electric Co., Inc., 95-1270 (La.6/23/95), 656 So.2d 988, 989 held that the…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1983 · in the opinion
Froud v. Celotex Corp. (1983)
…2d 199, 214-15, 90 S.Ct. 1583, 1595-96 (Black, J., dissenting); General Dynamics Corp., Electric Boat Division, v. Benefits Review Board (2d Cir.1977), 565 F.2d 208, 212; Williams v. Ray (1978), 146…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 27, 2005
DeMeyer v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (Matter of Asbestos Litig, 2005)
…York applies the Frye general acceptance standard rather than Daubert; once the challenger makes a prima facie showing that an expert's methodology is not generally accepted, the proponent must prove general acceptance by a fair…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · June 12, 2017 · in the opinion
In re Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2017)
General Overview of the Debtors GST, a North Carolina limited liability company, and Garrison, a North Carolina corporation, were wholly owned subsidiaries of Coltec Industries Inc at the time GST and Garrison filed their Chapter 11…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 11, 2012 · in the opinion
In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)
Moreover, the General Growth Properties Court relied on several equitable considerations in arriving at its decision, including that the default rate would not constitute a "penalty" to the "exceedingly solvent" debtor, a lack of misconduct, and…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)
…they function together. This finding is supported by evidence of record, including testimony cited by Mt. McKinley which established that Corning's General Counsel and Rule 30(b)(6) witness, Vincent P. Hatton, could not specify…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1989 · in the opinion
Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co. (1989)
…theory of non-identification liability is acceptable in New Jersey. \[9\] The court "reserve\[d\] decision on the general appropriateness of including products with different degrees of risk in a market-share analysis." 116 N.J…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 12, 1996 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Keene Corp. (1996)
…pleadings shall be according to the rules." 735 ILCS 5/2-201(a) (West 1994). General jurisdiction is invoked in the trial court when an action is filed and a summons is issued and served upon…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion
Motions for Access OF Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2013)
…regardless of their motive for inspecting such records. Thus, the press has no greater right of access than does the general public, and more importantly, an intervenor who is also a litigant in a collateral proceeding…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 27, 2007 · in the opinion
Reynolds v. Garlock Sealing Technologies (Mtr OF Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litigation, 2007)
…441, 444 \[Utah 1989\]; Ratterree v Bartlett, 238 Kan 11, 29, 707 P2d 1063, 1076 \[1985\]; General Motors Corp. v Lahocki, 286 Md 714, 723-733, 410 A2d 1039, 1044-1048 \[1980\]; Ward v Ochoa, 284…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · July 23, 2014 · in the opinion
Legal Newsline v. Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2014)
…to "state the reasons for its decision to seal supported by specific findings, and the reasons for rejecting alternatives to sealing to provide this court with sufficient information for meaningful appellate review." Media General Operations, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · October 7, 2011 · in the opinion
In re ACandS, Inc. (2011)
…filed),\[12\] or a ballot is filed with respect to the plan of reorganization,\[13\] the details of the putative creditor's interests have been kept from general public view to [\98] retain and protect privacy…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · December 21, 2012 · in the opinion
In re the Flintkote Company (2012)
…depends upon (i) whether under state law a corporation is permitted to bring an alter ego claim; and (ii) "whether the claim is a general claim that is common to all creditors." Rosener v. Majestic Mgmt.…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · December 21, 2012 · in the opinion
In re Flintkote Co. (2012)
…depends upon (i) whether under state law a corporation is permitted to bring an alter ego claim; and (ii) "whether the claim is a general claim that is common to all creditors." Rosener v. Majestic Mgmt.…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Motions for Access OF Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2013)
…regardless of their motive for inspecting such records. Thus, the press has no greater right of access than does the general public, and more importantly, an intervenor who is also a litigant in a collateral proceeding…