27 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 3, 2014
Whalen v. General Electric Corporation (2014)
The court denied General Dynamics' motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' strict products liability claim and denied its motion to strike the punitive damages prayer as moot, so the Whalens' claims proceeded. Under maritime law, a complaint…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 17, 2017
McClung v. 3M Company (2017)
The court severed the claims against General Electric and transferred them to the Southern District of West Virginia, granting General Electric's request and denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as moot…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · August 1, 2016 · in the opinion
Lund v. 3M Company (2016)
…district court case, Defendants argued that a Navy ship should not be considered a "product" for purposes of a strict liability claim. (Id. (citing Mack v. General Electric Co., 896 F. Supp. 2d 333, 345 (E…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 3, 2015
Spychalla v. Boeing Aerospace Operations Inc. (2015)
The district court denied summary judgment to Boeing, Cessna and General Electric, granted and denied the motions in limine in part, and allowed Boeing to file a late government contractor defense motion. The court did not…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2024 · in the opinion
Speck v. CBS Corporation (2024)
…Speck was to any work done on or around a General Electric product or product of another defendant\[,\]" and has "no idea" about the quantity of asbestos fibers to which Speck may have been exposed by…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 8, 2014 · in the opinion
Gottschall v. Crane Co. (2014)
…Johnson court's explicit approval of the reasoning of the federal court in In re Related Asbestos Cases. \[Johnson, supra,\] 43 Cal.4th at 69-70." (Gottschall v. General Electric (E.D.Pa., Dec. 9, 2011…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · February 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Glein v. Boeing Company (2011)
…known as VIACOM, Inc., formerly known as WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP.; CERTAIN-TEED CORP.; CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.; DANA CORP.; CEERE & COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GEORGIA…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Clark v. Aii Acquisition, LLC (2018)
…Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellees, The Boeing Company, BorgWarner Morse Tec LLC, CBS Corporation, General Electric Company, Goodyear Canada, INC., Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Harco LLC, fka Harco Laboratories, Inc., Henkel Corporation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Brown v. the Boeing Company (2012)
…under submission. DONE and ORDERED. \[1\] Plaintiff's complaint also named CBS Corporation (f/k/a Viacom, Inc.), DAP Products, Inc., General Electric Company, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, RT Vanderbilt Company…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 13, 2021
Gilstrap v. CBS Corporation (2021)
…Robert E. Lee 1959-1964; trainee/trainer Nuclear Power School Idaho Falls 1964-1967; master chief, engine room supervisor / Chief of the Boat General Dynamics/Electric Boat shipyard (USS Omaha and USS Indianapolis) Groton 1975-1980
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · December 21, 2016
Brinkman v. General Dynamics Corporation (2016)
…defense is available in failure-to-warn cases; this favored General Dynamics and Electric Boat over the Brinkmans. The government contractor defense is available in failure-to-warn cases, so a district court may not remand…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Kruse v. Actuant Corporation (2020)
… 3.) After his military service, Mr. Jimenez was "honorably discharged as the civilian equivalent of a Certified Aircraft Electrical Mechanic and Technician." (Id.) Apart from his service, Mr. Jimenez also "performed both supervisorial and hands-on…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 8, 2021
Carnes v. General Dynamics Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)
The magistrate judge recommended granting General Dynamics' motion for summary judgment against the Carnes plaintiffs because they produced no evidence that Mr. Carnes was exposed to an asbestos-containing product attributable to General Dynamics. Under Texas…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · March 31, 2021
LaFRENTZ v. Lockheed Martin Corporation (2021)
The court denied 3M and General Dynamics' request for an adverse inference jury instruction for spoliation, but granted a lesser remedy: a limited jury instruction describing the unanswered preservation request and the burial of the lung…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 26, 2016
Boyd v. Boeing Company (2016)
The court denied Lockheed Martin's and General Dynamics' motions to reconsider the order allowing plaintiffs to add them as defendants after the amendment deadline, and denied their motion to strike them from the amended complaint…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 28, 2021
Klick v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2021)
The court granted Boeing's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, finding no general or specific jurisdiction over Boeing in New Jersey, denied jurisdictional discovery, and declined to transfer the claims, so Boeing won…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 10, 2025 · in the opinion
Holste v. 3M Company (2025)
…cv-09814-JLS-E. January 10, 2025. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge. (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 34) Before the Court is…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · January 3, 2008 · in the opinion
Hilbert v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. (2008)
…Co., 425 F.3d 689, 694 (9th Cir.2005); Lovern v. General Motors Corp., 121 F.3d 160, 162 (4th Cir. 1997). The challenge is determining how specific the pleadings must be to place the defendants…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion
Walston v. Boeing Company (2014)
…gross negligence, yet short of premeditated and deliberate harm). Our holding in Birklid interprets the intentional tort consistently with general tort principles while still keeping in mind the IIA's purpose of balancing competing interests. 127…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Gillen v. Boeing Company (2014)
…proposed solution. Recently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cautioned that it "would not direct the substantive common law away from well-established general norms in the absence of some clear predominance of policy justifications." Lance v. Wyeth…