No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 2, 2004

    Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2004)

    Wesley Roberts, Jr., a pipefitter from 1941 to 1981, was exposed to asbestos-containing products at the Exxon refinery in Baton Rouge and other sites. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 1994 and died in 1995. He and his wife sued many…

  2. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 31, 2007 · in the opinion

    Graves v. Riverwood International Corp. (2007)

    …causing damages to the plaintiff. See also Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, supra. Analysis According to plaintiffs, the evidence they presented at trial was sufficient for the jury to find that Walter Graves contracted mesothelioma…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 7, 2012 · in the opinion

    Lewis v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2012)

    …a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 12, 2003 · in the opinion

    Breaux v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)

    …Fiberboard Corp.; Johns-Manville Sales Corp.; Philip Carey Corp.; Owens-Corning Fiberglass Company; and Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. as well. Plaintiffs settled the Texas litigation with all defendants except North American Refractories. Following jury trial, the jury…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 18, 1989 · in the opinion

    Vaughn v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc. (1989)

    …exposure to the asbestos in Foster Wheeler boilers was a substantial factor in causing Vaughn's mesothelioma. See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162 (4th Cir.1986).\[2\] The Shipowners' position is…

  6. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion

    Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)

    …Appeals and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WE CONCUR: GERRY L. ALEXANDER, C.J., and CHARLES W. JOHNSON, SUSAN OWENS, BARBARA A. MADSEN, MARY E. FAIRHURST, RICHARD B. SANDERS…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Shelton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …a showing that plaintiff's "particular asbestos disease is cumulative in nature" which can be satisfied by establishing that "a series of exposures was a \legal cause' of \[plaintiff's\] injury." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021

    Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)

    …defendants, holding they owed no duty of care to Khosravan, and awarded respondents their costs on appeal. A defendant owes no duty to protect workers from asbestos at premises it did not own, possess or control…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 25, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lopez v. McDERMOTT, Inc. (2019)

    …an obligation is owed to multiple persons, the obligation is severable, such that a tortfeasor owes a separate performance to each member of a class of beneficiaries entitled to bring a wrongful death claim. La. Civ…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 24, 2015

    Shearer v. AW Chesterton Company (2015)

    …which governed work aboard a dry-docked Navy ship, a manufacturer owes no duty to warn about asbestos products it neither made nor distributed, so a turbine maker is not liable for insulation applied after the…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020

    Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)

    …favor of the Exxon defendants. A defendant that did not own, possess or control the premises owes no premises or negligence duty to workers there, and a guarantee in a contract not intended to benefit the…

  12. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Wright v. 3M Company (2021)

    …landowner's premises. Id. The parties do not dispute Wright's status as an invitee. A landowner owes an invitee the duty of care set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (Am Law Inst.