No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

40 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    … Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation Worksites: Archie Motors Freight; Great Coastal Express; Archie's and Adley tractor-trailer fleet mechanic Archie Motors Freight 1964-1972; tractor-trailer fleet mechanic Great Coastal Express 1962-1964…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 25, 2020

    Hicks v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    …Crane was fraudulently joined, so Ford Motor Company's removal to federal court stood. A non-diverse defendant dismissed by involuntary summary judgment may be treated as fraudulently joined when procedural rules (waiver, and Illinois limits…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 28, 2022

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …of the estate of Robie W. Walls, brought a wrongful death action in federal court in North Carolina against Ford Motor Company and other defendants. The opinion refers to Mr. Walls's Navy service on the…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …ArvinMeritor and Navistar, and loss of consortium was dismissed against Strick and Ford. Under North Carolina law, an asbestos plaintiff can show causation with direct or circumstantial evidence of regular exposure to a defendant's product…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · April 27, 2012

    Pease v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    The district court adopted the Special Master's report, rejected Crane Company's objections, and denied Crane's second motion for summary judgment, so the plaintiffs' claims against Crane continued. A transferee MDL court's earlier…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 8, 2016

    Lepore v. Kelsey-Hayes Co. (2016)

    The Court of Appeal reversed summary judgment for Ford, Navistar and Kelsey-Hayes, finding triable issues on whether Lepore was exposed to asbestos from their products, and affirmed summary judgment for Gibbs International. A plaintiff in…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 3, 2017

    Hayden v. 3M Co. (2017)

    Thomas Hayden and his wife Jacqueline sued 3M Company and other corporations in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, in a case involving Mr. Hayden's mesothelioma. The opinion does not describe his work or exposure. Before trial, the…

  8. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion

    General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)

    …judgment as a matter of law. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company designed, manufactured, and sold motor vehicles during the period from 1975 to 1982. Rehm worked at two Ford plants in Louisville while employed by…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

    …exposed to asbestos from Ford vehicles, plaintiffs' claims stand. Accordingly, Ford's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. v. Navistar, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment Navistar, Inc. (f/k/a International Harvester Company) contends that…

  10. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005

    Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)

    …the appellees (including Allied Chemical, DuPont, Ford, GE, Kentucky Utilities Ghent Powerhouse, LG&E Cane Run and Mill Creek), Louisville millwright Facilities owned by the appellees (including Allied Chemical, DuPont, Ford, GE, Kentucky Utilities Ghent Powerhouse…

  11. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · December 4, 2012 · in the opinion

    Melford v. Abex Corporation (2012)

    …Corp.; Deere & Co.; Dorsey Trailers Inc.; Eaton Corp.; Fontaine Trailer Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Fruehauf Corp.; Gardner Denver Inc.; Genuine Parts Company Inc.; The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Goulds Pumps Incorporated; Grinnel Corp.; Harley Davidson Inc.…

  12. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · March 13, 2008 · in the opinion

    Woody v. AW Chesterton Company (2008)

    …are A.W. Chesterton Company; Advance Auto Parts, Inc.; Bayer CropScience, Inc.; Borg Warner Morse TEC, Inc.; Breeding Insulation Company, Inc.; Breeding Insulation Company, Chattanooga, Inc.; CBS Corporation; CertainTeed Corporation; Crane Company; Ford Motor Company; Foster…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Krauss v. Trane US Inc. (2014)

    …Moore Paint Company Inc.; Borden Chemical Inc., f/k/a Borden Chemical Company and n/k/a Hexio Specialty Chemicals Inc., Prentice Hall Corporation; Certain-Teed Corporation f/k/a Certainteed Products Corporation; Ford Motor Company…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · January 10, 2012 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Armstrong International, Inc (2012)

    …Company; Crane Co.; Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc.; Dap, Inc.; D & F Distributing, Inc.; Dravo Corporation; Duro Dyne Corporation; Elliott Turbomachinery Company; Essex Specialty Products, LLC; Ferro Engineering, a division of Oglebay Norton; Ford Motor Company…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …INC., AND ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY; FLOWSERVE US INC., SUCCESSOR TO VALTEK INTERNATIONAL; FLSMIDTH DORR-OLIVER, INC., AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY; FLSMIDTH, INC., FMC CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER LLC…

  16. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 5, 2015

    Jones v. 84 Lumber Company (2015)

    …four areas of Tennessee law: modified comparative fault, a $750,000 cap on noneconomic damages, allocating fault to nonparties (including bankrupt companies), and the innocent retailer statute. The plaintiffs agreed Tennessee law applied but said it…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2018

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2018)

    Robert Kraus, who was diagnosed with mesothelioma in December 2017, sued dozens of companies in Philadelphia state court. His wife, Margaret, joined with a consortium claim. He alleged asbestos exposure during Navy service aboard the U…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 8, 2010

    Horn v. A.W. Chesterson Co. (In re Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2010)

    Ten asbestos cases, brought by plaintiffs represented by the same law firm, were assigned to one New York County judge for trial. Eight of the plaintiffs, alleging mesothelioma, asked the court to consolidate their cases into three groups for joint…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 21, 2015 · in the opinion

    Kochera v. General Electric Company (2015)

    …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

  20. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion

    Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)

    …9\]. . . . In addition, there are some cases where the combination of two sound products creates a dangerous condition, and both manufacturers have a duty to warn. \[Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md. App. 1, 34…