No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

23 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 25, 2010

    Miranda v. Abex Corp. (2010)

    Four plaintiffs, Ernesto Miranda, Antonio DiBenedetto, Lutz Sommer and Gordon Cheney, sued Abex Corporation and other companies in New York County. They alleged they had mesothelioma from asbestos exposure, and two of the four had died. Miranda and…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 9, 2021

    Murphy v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …vessel, do not suffice. Government Contractor Defense and Removal; Venue, Removal and Transfer Worksites: Bethlehem Steel Key Highway Shipyard; Key Highway Shipyard, Baltimore Shipyard worker — helper, electrical equipment; apprentice electrician Key Highway Shipyard Baltimore 1973-1974

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · May 5, 2016

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    Charles Arbogast, Jr., and his wife Barbara sued twenty-seven companies, alleging that as manufacturers or distributors of various products they exposed him to asbestos and caused his mesothelioma. The complaint raised strict liability, negligence,…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 18, 2016

    Oliver v. Campbell McCORMICK, Inc. (2016)

    …1972 to 1978. Campbell-McCormick brought in third-party defendants for contribution, and General Electric removed the case to federal court, relying on the government contractor defense and the federal officer removal statute. Oliver asked the…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 29, 2011

    Corley v. Bill Vann Co. (In re Liability Litigation, 2011)

    The executor of Charles Corley's estate sued a group of companies in Alabama state court under the Alabama Wrongful Death Act. Mr. Corley had died of mesothelioma in October 2009. The case was removed to federal court and then sent to the asbestos…

  6. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …and Doyle, P. J., concur. \[1\] We note that this Court granted General Electric Company's motion to withdraw its appeal from Case No. A11A2025. \[2\] OCGA § 51-12-33 (d) provides as follows: (d) (1…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 31, 2014 · in the opinion

    Netzer v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …without subpoena by defendants";\[8\] — May 26, 2014: Netzer to "name \most likely to use' general product identification fact witnesses from the original fact witness list who have previously been deposed";\[9\] — June 9, 2014: "Last…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013 · in the opinion

    Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)

    …the weight of the proof presented—that matters." Id. at 782-83. After reviewing the conflicting cases, this court finds the analysis in Hagen cogent and consistent with the general removal standard. 28 U.S.C. …

  9. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · September 9, 2013 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific, LLC v. Fields (2013)

    …GENERAL CABLE INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as a successor in interest to BICC CABLES CORP." For the purposes of this opinion, we assume that "Phelps Dodge" is incorporated in references to BICC CABLES CORP., or GENERAL…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)

    …Sheppard was an electrician who performed work at LRHS in 1970-71, before Busch worked at LRHS. Sheppard did not know Busch personally and testified only as a "general product identification witness."\[15\] In a vein…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Sadowski v. AO Smith Water Prods. (2012)

    …any trades being around while you were doing renovation work? A: Yes. Q: Do you recall what type of trades? A: Here again, electricians, plumbers, sheet metal workers, sheetrock installers. Q: During the time period that…

  12. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2017)

    …asbestos fibers — were inhaled and became embedded in the lungs of the plaintiffs without their knowledge or consent. This, like the electric shock suffered by the plaintiff in Clark \[v. Choctawhatchee, 107 So.2d 609 (Fla…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)

    …her work history sheets, from speaking to Joan and her attorney, and from his general knowledge of the work practices of using joint compound in installing drywall—which included sanding, which creates dust, and sweeping the…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 4, 2011

    Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2011)

    …at issue, and circumstantial evidence that a manufacturer bought the supplier's asbestos can create a fact question on exposure. A raw-asbestos supplier also owes the general duty of reasonable care. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bourke v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2016)

    …56\] In Poche, the court began with the general premise that "\[a\] case that is initially nonremovable may become removable through the voluntary dismissal of nondiverse defendants."\[57\] All but one of the defendants—Eagle, Inc.…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    …702(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, nor do they satisfy the Daubert factors, including "testability," "peer review," and "general acceptance" within the "relevant scientific community," Bresler, 855 F.3d at 195. On the contrary…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 6, 2018 · in the opinion

    Lloyd E. Mitchell, Inc. v. Rossello (2018)

    …defendants; January 4, 2016 was the deadline for the plaintiff to name his "most likely to use" general product identification fact witnesses from the original fact witness list who have been previously deposed; January 18, 2016…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 29, 2024 · in the opinion

    In re Bestwall, LLC (2024)

    …Bankruptcy Procedure 2004—the "basic discovery device in bankruptcy cases." 9 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 2004.01\[1\]. As a general rule, discovery orders aren't final and appealable; they are part of resolving a larger dispute…

  19. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)

    …support a jury conclusion that W&G was the primary insulation contractor working at LRHS. This is not a case in which evidence was presented showing the general presence of asbestos-containing products at LRHS. Accordingly…

  20. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 13, 2014 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2014)

    …to the trial court, Dr. Mark's testimony simply "does not carry the day" because it is of a general nature, and because plaintiffs did not have any evidence of specific causation, the court could not…