21 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 13, 1995
Higgins v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)
The Appellate Division reversed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and remanded for a new trial in favor of plaintiff Higgins, and dismissed Owens-Corning's cross appeal on the medical monitoring award as moot. A…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · July 7, 1993
Behrendt v. GAF Corp. (1993)
…against defendants GAF, National Gypsum, Owens Corning and U.S. Gypsum. A jury award that bears no reasonable relation to uncontradicted losses warrants a new trial, and it cannot be upheld as a compromise verdict where…
-
Court case · Oklahoma Supreme Court · September 22, 1987
Case v. Fibreboard Corp. (1987)
Bobbie Edwin Case and his wife Eva sued twenty-two asbestos product makers in federal court in Oklahoma. Mr. Case said he was a sheet metal worker in Oklahoma from 1949 on and was exposed to asbestos-containing products made and sold by the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1992
Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)
…GAF, National Gypsum) jointly and severally liable, deducted the Owens-Corning settlement and a one-sixth Manville Trust share from the verdict, and awarded the plaintiffs Rule 238 delay damages, with some periods excluded. Where several…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · February 12, 1987
Rice v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1987)
Ruby Rice sued eighteen companies on behalf of the estate and heirs of her late husband, Norman E. Rice, who developed mesothelioma and died. She alleged he was exposed to asbestos products made or sold by the defendants and that they failed to warn…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 29, 1988
Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1988)
Mertice Pecorino sued about 18 asbestos product makers after her husband Anthony died in 1985 of mesothelioma. He had worked as an insulator from 1934 to 1977 at refineries, including the Texaco refinery in Port Arthur. In 1980 the couple had sued…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 28, 1988
Campo v. Asbestospray Corp. (1988)
Salvatore Campo and two other named plaintiffs sued Asbestospray Corporation and other asbestos companies on behalf of a proposed class. The class members said they had minor injuries from asbestos exposure. They had not sued before July 30, 1987,…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · March 28, 1986 · in the opinion
Roehling v. Nat. Gypsum Co. Gold Bond Bldg. (1986)
…BUILDING PRODUCTS; Owens-Illinois, Inc. and The Celotex Company, Successor-In-Interest to Philip Carey Corporation, Appellees, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Successor by Purchase of Kaylo Division of Owens-Illinois Glass Co.; Pittsburgh Corning Corp.;…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 15, 1986 · in the opinion
Dykes v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)
…969, 99 S.Ct. 461, 58 L.Ed.2d 428 (1978)). In a more recent decision, Murphy v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 779 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985), our court, speaking through Judge Kennedy, upheld the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)
…No. 162-35. The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin has recently rejected Dr. Frank's rephrasing in Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 211 F.Supp.3d 1196, 1207 (W.D. Wis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 29, 2011
Corley v. Bill Vann Co. (In re Liability Litigation, 2011)
The executor of Charles Corley's estate sued a group of companies in Alabama state court under the Alabama Wrongful Death Act. Mr. Corley had died of mesothelioma in October 2009. The case was removed to federal court and then sent to the asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)
…of punitive damages. This Court has previously granted Georgia-Pacific summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages in a similar asbestos action, Covington v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., No. GLR-12-461, 2014 WL 12661857…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)
…the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · January 8, 2015
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2015)
…ended before the marriage, but denied it to Georgia-Pacific. A defendant owes no duty to a spouse for loss of consortium if the couple was not married when the asbestos exposure occurred, and insurance-policy…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 4, 2011
Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2011)
…at issue, and circumstantial evidence that a manufacturer bought the supplier's asbestos can create a fact question on exposure. A raw-asbestos supplier also owes the general duty of reasonable care. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012
Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)
…the plaintiff's injury; inference, unverified allegations, or settled status alone are not enough. An employer owes no duty for take-home exposure, so it bears no allocable fault. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Take-Home…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)
…permissible to inform a jury that a co-defendant to the asbestos lawsuit had been dismissed when a remaining defendant "opens the door" by introducing evidence relating to the earlier presence of that now-dismissed party…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012 · in the opinion
Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)
…Specifically, he alleges exposure to asbestos-containing boilers, furnaces, pumps, valves, steam traps, baker ovens, gaskets, and other items. Mr. Wexler was diagnosed with lung cancer on May 12, 2011. He is currently sixty-eight years…