37 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015
Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)
…Court quashed the Third District's reversal and ordered the jury verdict and judgment for William Aubin against Union Carbide reinstated. Florida keeps the consumer expectations test from the Second Restatement for strict liability design defect…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 15, 2019
Robinson v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)
The Delaware Superior Court granted Union Carbide's motion for summary judgment against Marianne Robinson, ruling for Union Carbide on both the failure-to-warn claim and the Ohio strict liability claim. Under Ohio law, a…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020
Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)
The court granted Union Carbide Corporation's motion for summary judgment on the Gibbses' design-defect and failure-to-warn claims. Under South Carolina law as applied by the court, a raw-material supplier of asbestos…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 22, 1998 · in the opinion
Purcell v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1998)
…corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to A.P. Green and E.J. Bartells; National Gypsum Company, a California corporation; Turner & Newall PLC, a British corporation and its subsidiary J.W. Roberts Limited; Union Carbide…
-
Company or organization · People and organizations
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
…Gypsum Division it made joint compounds, textures and patching plaster containing chrysotile asbestos until 1977, using fiber bought partly from Union Carbide. In 2017 the company split itself under Texas law, placing its asbestos liabilities in…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 27, 1993 · in the opinion
Dunn v. Hovic (1993)
…prior insulation products because it contained a lower percentage of asbestos. It points to an independent study conducted by Union Carbide between 1961 and 1963 which concluded that Kaylo, unlike Johns-Manville and Philip Carey products…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 18, 2000 · in the opinion
Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)
…Lacelaw Corp., 861 F.2d 224 (9th Cir.1988). "Pleadings in a prior case may be used as evidentiary admissions." Williams v. Union Carbide Corp., 790 F.2d 552, 556 (6th Cir.1986). The Ninth Circuit…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)
…analysis, and evaluation in the Construction Insulation Shop at a Union Carbide plant to resolve "unanswered health problems." Mr. Peele did not include Kaylo in the third of the three intervals of sampling because the first…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 9, 2010 · in the opinion
Larson v. Bondex Int'l (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2010)
\[6\] Defendant Union Carbide is sued as a "supplier defendant" for supplying asbestos fiber that was incorporated into other products, in this case as a supplier to Defendant Georgia-Pacific for use in its joint compound…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · June 7, 1974
J. R. Hurd to W. A. Nalbone on Asbestos Caution Labels for Joint System Products (1974)
Georgia-Pacific intracompany memo replying to a June 3, 1974 letter from W. A. Nalbone about changes to asbestos caution labels on joint system products. The writer said the new label wording complied with OSHA regulations, that the added respirator…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · June 10, 1974
C. W. Lehnert to Ed Sing on Asbestos Caution Labels at Georgia-Pacific (1974)
A Georgia-Pacific interdepartmental communication dated June 10, 1974, from C. W. Lehnert (Tigard) to Ed Sing (Acme) about asbestos caution labels. It stated that the labels in use met the OSHA requirement but lacked an additional statement…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · July 27, 1971
M. F. Fink to Georgia-Pacific Plant Managers on Mica-Asbestos Controls (1971)
A Georgia-Pacific interdepartmental communication from M. F. Fink in Portland about controls for mica and asbestos handling in light of OSHA standards. It discussed threshold limits for mica dust, recommended Dustfoe 66 respirators, and said…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 14, 1997
Van Winkle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)
…for prior acts of coconspirators only if it knew of and approved those acts when it joined. Wrongful Death and Survival; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Unarco (Union Asbestos & Rubber Company) Bloomington plant; Unarco asbestos plant…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · November 23, 1994
Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd. (1994)
…in furtherance, which may be intentional or negligent and may be committed by any conspirator. Wrongful Death and Survival; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Unarco (Union Asbestos & Rubber Company) Bloomington plant; Unarco Industries asbestos plant, Bloomington…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 24, 1979
Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia Materials Co. (1979)
…rays in 1957, a 1965 hospital stay where he was told he had pulmonary fibrosis, union articles from 1968, and a 1973 doctor's history saying he was told of asbestosis in 1957. Nolan said no…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 31, 1996 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Baltimore City (1996)
…Corning planned to use its medical literature file to promote dissension among the membership of the Asbestos Workers Union by alerting them to the dangers of asbestos. The memorandum stated that Owens-Corning was in possession…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)
…seeks to offer evidence through exhibits, they must be identified by affidavit or otherwise be admissible. Martz v. Union Labor Life Insurance Co., 757 F.2d 135, 138 (7th Cir.1985). "Supporting materials designed to establish…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · February 12, 1987 · in the opinion
Rice v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1987)
…s motion for summary judgment is denied. \[1\] It should also be noted that the cause of action in Union Supply arose prior to the effective date of CPLA and was not governed by its provisions.
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 2, 2004 · in the opinion
Torrejon v. Mobil Oil Co. (2004)
…that it is proper to grant JNOV when the issues are predominately legal ones, which are clearly within the trial court's province); Rougeau v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 432 So.2d 1162, 1166 (La.App…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · August 26, 1999 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Ballard (1999)
…paid for the misconduct proven in this case. The uncontradicted evidence in this case was that Owens-Corning's past and future liability in asbestos cases would have no significant impact upon the corporation. Greg Peterson…