7 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020
Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)
… Design Defect; Sophisticated User and Intermediary Defenses; Choice of Law Worksites: General Electric Large Steam Turbine Division; Deforest Company; home renovations with his father; General Plumbing job sites laborer, plumber, and shade tree mechanic Deforest Company…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 20, 2012 · in the opinion
Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assoc. (2012)
…v. Westinghouse Electric Corp, 89 NY2d 955 (1997) (internal citations omitted). Here, the evidence showed the following: Mr. Konstantin worked at two construction sites from 1975 to 1977 where TLC's predecessor was the general contractor…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)
…822 (1971); Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co., 313 U.S. 487, 61 S.Ct. 1020, 85 L.Ed. 1477 (1941); Clarin Corp. v. Massachusetts General Life Ins. Co., 44 F.3d 471, 474 (7th…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Robinson v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)
…court found that Monsanto had no duty under Ohio law to warn the plaintiff directly where Monsanto supplied chemicals to electrical equipment manufacturers who in turn sold the equipment to consumers.\[27\] As in the case…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion
Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)
…jury instructions pertaining to the duty to warn. Aubin requested the trial court to include a general instruction that Union Carbide had the duty to warn the end user, while Union Carbide asserted that it was…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Konstantin v. 640 Third Ave. Assoc. (2014)
…or other misconduct of an adverse party. In its reply memorandum, Tishman cites the "general interests of justice," as additional grounds for granting the subpoenas. Tishman's motion is primarily based on the contention that plaintiff…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 23, 2014 · in the opinion
Konstantin v. 640 Third Ave. Assoc. (2014)
… In its reply memorandum, Tishman cites the "general interests of justice," as additional grounds for granting the subpoenas. Tishman's motion is primarily based on the contention that plaintiff withheld discovery during the pendency of the…