20 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · April 12, 2013
Stallings v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation (2013)
…keeping the case in federal court on General Electric's and Crane Company's federal officer removal. A government contractor may remove under the federal officer removal statute if it was acting under a federal agency…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 4, 2008 · in the opinion
Taylor v. Union Carbide Corporation (2008)
…Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, f/k/a/Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Certainteed Corporation; C.H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman, Inc.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; Fraser's Boiler Service, Inc.; General Electric Company; Georgia-Pacific Corporation…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 3, 2008 · in the opinion
Gregory v. Beazer East (2008)
…Corporation, Chicago Bridge and Iron, Commonwealth Edison, Foseco, Inc., Garlock Sealing Technologies, General Electric, Ingersoll Rand, John Crane, Inc., Lincoln Electric Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Pittsburgh Metals Purifying, a/k/a Treesdale, Inc., Reynolds Aluminum…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · January 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Bondex International, Inc. (2014)
…An Ohio Corporation; CBS CORPORATION, A Delaware Corporation (Successor By Merger With CBS Corporation F/K/A Westinghouse Electric Corporation)Formerly Known As Viacom Inc.; GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, A Georgia Corporation (Sued Individually And As Successor…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 2, 2006 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Benjamin (2006)
…default on another person."\[7\] Binnix v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 593 F.Supp. 1180, 1182 (Md. 1984) (quoting Stewart v. United Electric Light and Power Co., 104 Md. 332, 343, 65 A. 49, 53 (1906))…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 17, 2015 · in the opinion
Stallings v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation (2015)
…526 U.S. 137, 147-49 (1999) (applying Daubert's general principles to the expert matters discussed in Rule 702). First, the Court must determine "whether the experts' testimony reflects \scientific knowledge,' whether their findings are…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 11, 2014 · in the opinion
Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (2014)
If the plaintiff proves general causation with reliable scientific evidence that approximately 400 milligrams of the medication can cause death in children, the plaintiff will be able to prove specific causation in at least two ways…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)
Maddox's opinion is insufficient as to specific causation. Id. at 839. Here, appellees endeavor to rely on material practice simulation studies performed by their general causation expert, William Longo, Ph.D., a material scientist. Dr…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 10, 2013
Greer v. Ace Hardware Corporation (2013)
…summary judgment, the plaintiff must produce evidence identifying a specific asbestos-containing product the defendant made or supplied and to which the plaintiff was exposed; general assertions that "some" products contained asbestos, or guesswork, are not…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012 · in the opinion
Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
…we agree with Ford's contention that "case reports" and other anecdotal evidence are not probative of either general or actual causation,\[14\] but we must point out that Ford severely overstates the strength of its…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 26, 2001 · in the opinion
Burns v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)
… John Crane, Inc.; DAP, Inc.; Fibreboard Corporation; GAF Corporation; General Refractories Company; Harbison-Walker Refractories Company; Harcros Chemicals, Inc., as Successor-in-Interest to Thompson-Hayward Chemical Company; Kaiser Refractories, A Division of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)
…a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Konstantin v. 640 Third Ave. Assoc. (2014)
…or other misconduct of an adverse party. In its reply memorandum, Tishman cites the "general interests of justice," as additional grounds for granting the subpoenas. Tishman's motion is primarily based on the contention that plaintiff…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 23, 2014 · in the opinion
Konstantin v. 640 Third Ave. Assoc. (2014)
… In its reply memorandum, Tishman cites the "general interests of justice," as additional grounds for granting the subpoenas. Tishman's motion is primarily based on the contention that plaintiff withheld discovery during the pendency of the…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)
…a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 5, 2009 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Bondex Int'l (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2009)
…address the standards pertaining to relation back, and then proceed to apply those standards to the case before us. Relation Back in General Relation back is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) which provides…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · September 8, 1994 · in the opinion
Peerman v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (1994)
…court found that, although Mrs. Peerman had produced evidence that Georgia-Pacific's Ready Mix Joint Compound and T & N's Limpet were used at the same general work site where Mr. Peerman worked, she had…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion
Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)
…bar date order has preclusive effect, it would call into question the "right to maintain the action," which implicates an exception to the general rule that this court will decline to review arguments abandoned below. Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · May 2, 1991 · in the opinion
Harding v. Proko Industries, Inc. (1991)
…find Kansas or Texas law to be applicable to the plaintiff's claims. Section 6(2) of the Second Restatement identifies seven general considerations which are relevant to the resolution of a given conflict of laws…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 4, 2011 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2011)
…Mark, a 1967 Harvard Medical School graduate, is employed as a pathologist in the Department of Pathology at Massachusetts General Hospital and practices primarily in pulmonary and autopsy pathology. Dr. Mark is also a professor at…