10 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · August 14, 2020
Hailey v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
The estate and family of Charles Anthony Shockley sued several equipment makers after he died of pleural mesothelioma in January 2016. Mr. Shockley served in the Navy from 1968 to 1972 as a machinist mate on the destroyer USS Henderson, working…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021
Pizarro v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2021)
Renato Pizarro and his wife sued NASSCO, Pep Boys and other companies, alleging his mesothelioma came from asbestos exposure. The opinion describes two sources. One was the Navy overhaul of the USS Bristol County, where plaintiffs say NASSCO removed…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 12, 2020
Pizarro v. Astra Flooring Company (2020)
Renato Pizarro alleged he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working as a mechanic aboard Navy ships from 1975 to 1998. He and his wife Mercedita sued a number of companies in California state court, including National Steel and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 6, 2019 · in the opinion
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…Marks, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP, David A. Speziali, SPEZIALI, GREENWALD & HAWKINS, pro hac vice & Erin P. Fraser, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Christopher S. Marks, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP, David A. Speziali, SPEZIALI, GREENWALD…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · October 23, 2017 · in the opinion
Jack v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2017)
…Marks, SEDGWICK LLP & Erin P. Fraser, SEDGWICK LLP. Gardner-Denver Inc, Defendant, represented by Claude Bosworth, RIZZO MATTINGLY BOSWORTH PC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Christopher S. Marks, SEDGWICK LLP & Erin P. Fraser, SEDGWICK LLP…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · August 14, 2020 · in the opinion
McAllister v. McDERMOTT, Inc. (2020)
…on the discharge side of the pump, and on top of the pump.\[37\] The electric motors had a transition piece that connected the motor to the pump casing, and there was an additional asbestos gasket…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Shaw v. American Friction (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…is the proper standard under Delaware law, and the General Scheduling Order expressly requires a "showing of good cause" to modify the scheduling order.\[28\] To assess good cause, as the Special Master and Superior Court…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 27, 2023 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…officer removal statute, Leite, 749 F.3d at 1122 ("We recognize that defendants enjoy much broader removal rights under the federal officer removal statute than they do under the general removal statute\[.\]"); Durham, 445 F.3d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 6, 2023 · in the opinion
Welch v. Crane Co. (2023)
…each of their experts' reports, and Plaintiff will have the opportunity to object to such testimony at trial. And general causation testimony may be relevant and helpful to the trier of fact. Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation…