No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · March 21, 1994

    Ingram v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. (1994)

    …Liability, and Workers' Compensation; Fear of Cancer and Medical Monitoring Worksites: K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant; K-25 Plant, Oak Ridge, Oak Ridge employee of Union Carbide K-25 Plant, Oak Ridge Oak Ridge 1973-1979

  2. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 24, 2014 · in the opinion

    Mine Safety Appliances Company v. Aiu Insurance Company (2014)

    …This Court considers analogous case law. In the asbestos context, courts have found that where a company made a "calculated risk," it did not amount to an "expectation of damage."\[33\] In Union Carbide Corporation v.

  3. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)

    …Granite State Insurance Company 15) Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company 16) Highlands Insurance Company 17) Insurance Company of North America 18) Lexington Insurance Company 19) National Surety Corporation 20) National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh…

  4. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)

    …contrary interpretation of Connecticut law. The second defect in the court's analysis is that it assumed that the parties intended to import the act's definition of the term "personal injury." See Commercial Union Ins…

  5. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)

    …four phases; subsequently, the court granted the motions for summary judgment filed by the defendant Government Employees Insurance Company and to dismiss filed by the defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, and denied…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)

    …Donald E. Santarelli, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for Commercial Union Insurance Companies, Amici Curiae urging remand for full consideration in Nos. 81-1179, 81-1180, 81-1181 and 81-1182. John Mahoney, Jr…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (2021)

    …such judicial involvement derives from Covil's status as a dissolved corporation in receivership and does not entitle the Zurich Settlement to absolute protection from production in litigation.\[8\] Allowing for limited disclosure under the circumstances…

  8. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · October 30, 1997 · in the opinion

    Green v. General Dynamics Corp. (1997)

    …calculating the average weekly wage of a claimant" with an occupational disease. Id. The only evidence in the legislative history suggesting possible retroactivity is a statement at the public hearing by a union official, George Strutt…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · February 27, 1997 · in the opinion

    Sybron Transition v. Sec. Ins. Co. of Hartford (1997)

    …on its counterclaim. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. \[1\] Sybron Transition Corporation is Kerr's parent company. \[2\] Apparently, Security wanted Hartford to share in the defense…

  10. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)

    …the brief, MaryKate J. Geary, West Hartford and Marianne May, pro hac vice, for the appellee-cross appellant (defendant Westport Insurance Corporation). Lawrence D. Mason, pro hac vice, with whom were John A. Lee, pro hac…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …Combustion Engineering and Global Technologies. Furthermore, the trusts appear to have fulfilled Congress's expectation that they would serve the interests of both current and future asbestos claimants and corporations saddled with asbestos liability. In particular…