Search

• Organization: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company ×
• Organization: Columbia Casualty Company ×
• Clear filters

6 results for “Owens-Illinois”

1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 27, 1998 · in the opinion

   In re Asbestos Litigation (1998)

   …Mitchell, Fibreboard Corporation, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Continental Casualty Company, Pacific Indemnity, Francis McGovern, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, Columbia Casualty Company, CNA Casualty Company of California, Celotex Corp., Daniel Herman Rudd Jr., on…

2. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion

   RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)

   …Corp., 667 F.Supp. 1523, 1538 (S.D. Ga. 1983) (endeavoring to provide guidance "carefully, methodically and with an eye toward practical solutions"); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 138 N.J. 437, 477-78…

3. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion

   RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)

   … Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America, supra, 667 F.2d 1044 n.19, 1047 n.25; Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., supra, 138 N.J. 457. For these reasons, we are persuaded…

4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion

   Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

   …the trial court's method of apportionment is not challenged on appeal, we find no error in the decision to hold each policy responsible in full subject to such apportionment.\[17\] (See also Owens-Illinois, Inc…

5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

   In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

   …Inc., 151 F.3d 297 (5th Cir.1998). Owens Corning, a major asbestos manufacturer, sought to create a "National Settlement Program" outside the judicial system by entering private contracts with plaintiffs' firms that would have settled…

6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion

   Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)

   …than one insurer will be triggered. Because each insurer is fully liable, and because Keene cannot collect more than it owes in damages, the issue of dividing insurance obligations arises. The only logical resolution of this…