28 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Connor v. Covil Corporation (2021)
…EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY; FLOWSERVE US, INC., individually and as successor to BYRON JACKSON PUMP COMPANY; FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, f/k/a Fluor Corporation; FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION; FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…this work, on its own, leaves only the general possibility that Covil insulation was likewise present. Plaintiffs next argue that Mr. Vinson worked in close proximity to Covil employees who were installing or maintaining insulation. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…the insulation at the RJ Reynolds plant," he answered that he did not "recall exactly who was working" and testified only that Daniel employees were general contractors who "did all kind of different jobs." (ECF No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Ms. Finch has not shown that Pfizer reasonably should have known that the pre-1978 records may have…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)
…in other jurisdictions, that a pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability policy bars coverage only for traditional environmental pollution such as oil spills or the dumping of hazardous waste into the natural environment. Id.…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)
…that\] would lie between arduous and Sisyphean." That commentary, however, was made not with respect to the general retroactive application of allocation rules but, rather, in the specific context of the court's determination that the…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion
Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)
…Hatfield conducted a personal inspection of the building and described the overall condition of the Spraycraft in the building as fair.\[146\] The Spraycraft was installed primarily above suspended ceilings and in mechanical and electrical closets…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 27, 2024
Craft v. Eagle, Inc. (2024)
The Louisiana Fourth Circuit granted Climmie Craft's writ application, reversed the trial court's rulings limiting her industrial hygiene expert Kenneth Garza to general opinions, and remanded, ruling against the defendants (Ports America Gulfport, Crowley…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 24, 2014
Mine Safety Appliances Company v. Aiu Insurance Company (2014)
…it applies. It applies only if the insured was substantially certain that a known failure of its product would cause the plaintiff's injury, not merely aware of general disease hazards. Choice of Law; Insurance Coverage;…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · August 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Finch v. Covil Corporation (2020)
As we have explained: \[J\]ury instructions articulate general principles of law that decide cases. Of course appellate opinions may guide a district judge's discretion in formulating jury instructions, or even bear upon the formation…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)
…and accidental" exception to pollution exclusion was intended to preclude coverage for gradually occurring pollution, "so that only a temporally abrupt release of pollutants would be covered as an exception to the general pollution exclusion"). Indeed…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard (2016)
…It is well-established that the trial court is afforded wide discretion in determining [\771] whether expert testimony should be admitted and who should or should not be qualified as an expert. See General Elec. Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion
McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)
…high known or potential rate of error and whether there are standards controlling the technique's operation," and (4) "\[w\]hether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within a relevant scientific community." Kumho Tire Co.…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · January 5, 2022 · in the opinion
Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (2022)
…s operations allegedly exposed persons to asbestos, resulting in claims and lawsuits against it. Penn insured Covil under comprehensive general liability policies between March 1986 and March 1988. One of the lawsuits against Covil, Rollins v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Gea Mechanical Equipment US, Inc. v. First State Insurance Company (2023)
…June 24, 2019) (the "Thornton Action"). Defendants, or their predecessors, issued certain primary or excess general liability policies (the "Policies") to GEA Mechanical's predecessor, Centrico, Inc. ("Centrico"),\[2\] covering various periods from May 15, 1979…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 14, 2020 · in the opinion
Finch v. Covil Corporation (2020)
…nature of Mr. White's representation. \[5\] Section 33-14-107(b) requires that the notice "(1) be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the dissolved corporation's principal office. …
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion
Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)
…Jaeger 1959). An insurance contract represents an exchange of an uncertain loss for a certain loss. In a comprehensive general liability insurance policy, the uncertain loss is the possibility of incurring legal liability, and the certain…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Covil Corporation (2011)
…erred by failing to apply the average weekly wages in conjunction with section 97-38. "\\[I\]n discerning the intent of the General Assembly, statutes in pari materia should be construed together and harmonized whenever possible.'…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 1, 2019 · in the opinion
Finch v. Covil Corporation (2019)
…130:23 -131:1. The fact that this evidence also made Covil "look bad" in some general sense does not make it inadmissible character evidence or unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403. It was highly relevant and…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · July 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (2024)
…recognition of the role notice provisions play in insurance contracts," and stating, "Had the General Assembly intended to categorically prohibit the enforcement of notice clauses in all policies, it would have done so." 427 S.C…