No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

20 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 2, 1994

    Atkinson v. Celotex Corp. (1994)

    …Service Refinery approximately 35 years; electrician Cities Service Refinery 22 years; various crafts Cities Service Refinery 18 years; pipe fitter Cities Service Refinery 35 years; general craft foreman Cities Service Refinery 32 years; laborer Cities Service…

  2. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)

    …in other jurisdictions, that a pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability policy bars coverage only for traditional environmental pollution such as oil spills or the dumping of hazardous waste into the natural environment. Id.…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002 · in the opinion

    Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)

    …In that case, the court concluded that repair and replacement costs incurred by the insured on account of damage to electrical transformers caused by a design defect were not "ensuing losses." Id. In support of its…

  4. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)

    …that\] would lie between arduous and Sisyphean." That commentary, however, was made not with respect to the general retroactive application of allocation rules but, rather, in the specific context of the court's determination that the…

  5. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)

    …Hatfield conducted a personal inspection of the building and described the overall condition of the Spraycraft in the building as fair.\[146\] The Spraycraft was installed primarily above suspended ceilings and in mechanical and electrical closets…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 27, 2024

    Craft v. Eagle, Inc. (2024)

    The Louisiana Fourth Circuit granted Climmie Craft's writ application, reversed the trial court's rulings limiting her industrial hygiene expert Kenneth Garza to general opinions, and remanded, ruling against the defendants (Ports America Gulfport, Crowley…

  7. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 24, 2014

    Mine Safety Appliances Company v. Aiu Insurance Company (2014)

    …it applies. It applies only if the insured was substantially certain that a known failure of its product would cause the plaintiff's injury, not merely aware of general disease hazards. Choice of Law; Insurance Coverage;…

  8. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)

    …and accidental" exception to pollution exclusion was intended to preclude coverage for gradually occurring pollution, "so that only a temporally abrupt release of pollutants would be covered as an exception to the general pollution exclusion"). Indeed…

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard (2016)

    …It is well-established that the trial court is afforded wide discretion in determining [\771] whether expert testimony should be admitted and who should or should not be qualified as an expert. See General Elec. Co…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · January 30, 1981

    Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of No. America (1981)

    …Liberty), holding that coverage is triggered by exposure to asbestos, and denied Aetna's challenge to jurisdiction. Under occurrence-based general liability policies, coverage for asbestosis, mesothelioma and bronchogenic carcinoma is triggered by the claimant's…

  11. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · May 28, 1992 · in the opinion

    Cole v. Celotex Corp. (1992)

    …the Tab?, 48 Fordham L.Rev. 657, 684 n. 152 (1980) (quoting Elliott, The New Comprehensive General Liability Policy, in Liability Insurance Disputes 12-3, 12-5 (S. Schreiber ed. 1968)); See also Nothstein, Toxic Torts…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 20, 1984 · in the opinion

    JT Thorp, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1984)

    …had progressed, but doctors decided against attempting surgery. Butler remains in general good health and bicycles daily. The sole medical opinion concluded that Butler was not disabled as of the time of the opinion, but annual…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gea Mechanical Equipment US, Inc. v. First State Insurance Company (2023)

    …June 24, 2019) (the "Thornton Action"). Defendants, or their predecessors, issued certain primary or excess general liability policies (the "Policies") to GEA Mechanical's predecessor, Centrico, Inc. ("Centrico"),\[2\] covering various periods from May 15, 1979…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)

    …Jaeger 1959). An insurance contract represents an exchange of an uncertain loss for a certain loss. In a comprehensive general liability insurance policy, the uncertain loss is the possibility of incurring legal liability, and the certain…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 4, 1978 · in the opinion

    Ins. Co. of No. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations (1978)

    …lawsuits. D. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Cases dealing with statute of limitation issues are not applicable to this coverage problem. See, Tijsseling v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp., Ltd., 55 Cal.App.3d 623, 127 Cal…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (2021)

    …cross-claims, Covil asserted counterclaims against Zurich and cross-claims against Sentry, USF&G, TIG, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company ("Hartford"), "each of \[which\] issued general liability policies to Covil" (Docket Entry 155, ¶ 109). (Id., ¶…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Morvant v. Maryland Casualty Company (2014)

    …2010) (Duval, J.). In RepublicBank, the Fifth Circuit considered state and federal actions involving the same general subject matter and sharing a common issue, the validity of a promissory note. 828 F.2d at 1121. The…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · July 16, 2019 · in the opinion

    Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas (2019)

    …P. 12(b)(7)). The decision under Rule 19(a) has to be made in terms of the general policies of avoiding multiple litigation, providing the parties with complete and effective relief in a single action…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …"The presumption is that the statute flows in orderly progression [\370] from general statement to specific instance so that ordinarily the qualification of a later clause upon an earlier one is to be expected." 1A Norman…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    Zurich American v. Insurance Co. of North America (2019)

    …indistinctness, or uncertainty in the meaning of the language in the policy. Language is ambiguous if it is reasonably open to different interpretations." Seeck v. Geico General Ins. Co., 212 S.W.3d 129, 132 (Mo…