No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1999 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Metalclad Insulation Corp. (1999)

    General Motors Corp., supra, 40 Cal.App.4th at p. 356, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 580; Barr v. ACandS, Inc., supra, 57 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1049-1053, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 494.) The issue…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)

    …appropriate. Appellants assert that a determination as to whether there was insufficient knowledge of the manufacturer or of the scientific field in general would have been relevant in order to determine whether the Kent cigarettes, and…

  3. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · February 15, 2006 · in the opinion

    Weihl v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2006)

    …in a general fashion. He then alleged that defendants were "regularly engaged in the business of manufacturing, designing, processing, marketing, distributing, applying, repairing, and/or selling products containing asbestos fiber for use in electrical products and…

  4. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    DeLisle v. Crane Co. (2018)

    …in every proceeding. However, this Court's case law makes clear that a proper and thorough application of Frye allows the trial judge to inquire [\1235] beyond bare assertions of general acceptance. Daubert, on the other…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 9, 2008

    Barnes v. AO Smith Water Products Co. (2008)

    …the Montross, Perdicaro, Enea and Iqbal cases separate, over the defendants' general opposition. Under CPLR 602(a), actions with common questions of law or fact may be tried jointly. The Malcolm factors guide the choice, and…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2007)

    …Cadlo's\] contraction of cancer, \[Maxlyn Cadlo\] would have continued her marital relationship with him for another 20 years." (See Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp. (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 1125, 1152 \[briefs are reliable indications…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 14, 2012 · in the opinion

    Couscouris v. Hatch Grinding Wheels, Inc. (2012)

    …2012. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL GEORGE H. KING, District Judge. Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order re: Motion for Remand and for Award of Costs Incurred This matter is before us on…

  8. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion

    McGuire v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)

    …been a strictly personal choice, yet it was a thing of comfort and convenience to himself while he was serving as maintenance man and general custodian and while he was on call at all hours. Therefore…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 12, 2018 · in the opinion

    Prokocimer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …continuing general belief that exposure to asbestos below the TLV of the time period of 5 million particles per cubit foot ("mppcf") of air did not represent a hazard to workers. There was no general recognition…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Ganoe v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2014)

    …response, the plaintiff provided "little more than general allegations against" the defendant and "d\[id\] not state specific facts showing that \[the plaintiff\] was actually exposed to asbestos-containing material from \[the defendant's\] products." (Id…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …or dust allaying media. (Stewart Decl. ex G).\[2\] Plaintiff also emphasizes Defendant's concession that it was familiar with and subject to California general industry safety orders (Caldo Trans. 2162:16-22), that it knew…

  12. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …The "minimum contacts" prong of the test can be broken down into two types of personal jurisdiction, specific and general. A state exercises "specific jurisdiction" over a non-resident defendant when the lawsuit arises from or…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 30, 2018 · in the opinion

    Steiner v. Hollingsworth & Vose Company (2018)

    …s Brief, at 1. "Collateral review is appropriate, despite the general directive that appellate courts conduct review only of final orders, if an order is (1) separable from and collateral to the main cause of action, …

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON, Inc. (2014)

    …34); Gould MTD (Dkt. \# 36).) II. ANALYSIS A. Removal Jurisdiction In general, a defendant may remove to federal court any state action over which a district court would have original jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. …

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)

    …d\] that Soco West, Inc. is not subject to jurisdiction in the State of Washington." Plant Insulation Company presented a declaration from its general counsel. Based upon his personal knowledge, he averred that the company was…