No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 5, 2010 · in the opinion

    Buttitta v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2010)

    …weight to be given to Gordon's opinion. "Universal acceptance of a particular methodology is not required before scientific opinion is admitted. . . ." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 288 N.J. Super. 258, 268 (App. Div…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

    …1986); see also Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2004-1589 (La. App. 1 Cir. 9/23/05), 923 So. 2d 118, writ denied sub nom. Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 2005-2318 (La. 3…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002 · in the opinion

    Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)

    …Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-64 (4th Cir.1986); Chavers v. General Motors Corporation, 349 Ark. 550, 79 S.W.3d 361 (2002)(an asbestos case against brake manufacturers); Johnson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass…

  5. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 28, 2007 · in the opinion

    DiCENZO v. A-Best Prods. Co., Inc. (2007)

    …estimate the percentage of insulation that each company supplied. {¶ 11} Owens Corning distributed asbestos-containing Kaylo insulation products from 1953 until 1973. Hamilton distributed Kaylo products from 1963. It sold insulation products to Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weible v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …reasonable inference that Mr. Weible inhaled asbestos fibers from the products. See Coward v. Owens-Corning, 729 A.2d 614, 622-623 (Pa.Super.1999) (evidence must demonstrate that the plaintiff worked, on a regular basis…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

    …a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Id. (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)

    …Karst & Von Oiste and George H. Kim for Plaintiff and Respondent. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION WILLHITE, Acting P.J. In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the California Supreme Court addressed the…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

    …L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 26, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …ago. See, e.g., Brodkin Report at 64. Defendant first cites to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Rutherford v. Owens Illinois, Inc., regarding the proof of causation required in asbestos-related cases. 16 Cal…

  11. Court case · North Dakota Supreme Court · December 22, 1999 · in the opinion

    Black v. Abex Corp. (1999)

    …Vigiolto v. Johns-Manville Corp., 643 F.Supp. 1454, 1457 (W.D.Pa.1986); Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d 1203, 1216-21 (1997); Goldman…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Hake v. Allied Fluid Products Corp. (2018)

    …was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …that the California Supreme Court has not yet determined whether an "every exposure" theory of liability is consistent with the substantial factor test that applies in asbestos cases. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 21, 2008 · in the opinion

    Early v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2008)

    …Grumman Aircraft Corp. From 1965 through 1993, he worked as a millwright, maintaining machinery, including presses, ovens, boilers, pumps, and valves. He worked in the boiler room and assisted in dismantling the boiler room, which he…