No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

31 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · December 12, 1990

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

    …Edwards, holding his asbestosis claim was not time barred, and rejected the defendants (Owens-Illinois and others) on the limitations defense. In negligence or products liability actions involving latent disease, a cause of action under Miss…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1989

    Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co. (1989)

    Two long-time employees of the American Cyanamid plant, Robert Sholtis and Sam Lee, sued asbestos manufacturers and suppliers. Sholtis died at 65 of pleural asbestosis. He had worked as a mill operator, maintenance laborer, pipefitter's helper and…

  3. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 3, 1997

    Anchor Packing Co. v. Grimshaw (1997)

    …reversed the judgment against Hopeman Brothers. It otherwise affirmed the judgments for the plaintiffs against Anchor and Owens-Corning. The Maryland cap on noneconomic damages applies to asbestos wrongful death claims arising after October 1, 1994…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 25, 2020

    Hicks v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    …may be treated as fraudulently joined when procedural rules (waiver, and Illinois limits on reconsideration with late evidence) leave no reasonable possibility of reinstating the claim; the common-defense exception does not apply where the reason…

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 27, 2004

    Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries (2004)

    …trial court's ruling that Cichirillo's claim against Northrop Grumman (Avondale), Flintkote, Territo, Owens-Illinois, Uniroyal, Hopeman Brothers and Charles Johnson was prescribed, and remanded the case for further proceedings. A timely suit in a…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 23, 1994

    Busfield v. AC & S., Inc. (1994)

    Alva Busfield and his wife sued many asbestos companies. A jury found that Busfield had an asbestos-related disease, asymptomatic asbestosis or pleural thickening, but that it caused him no harm. The opinion does not describe where or how he was…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 2, 2017

    Savoie v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. (2017)

    Joseph Savoie sued in Louisiana state court, alleging he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working at the Avondale shipyard (now Huntington Ingalls) in various positions from about 1948 to 1996. He said he was exposed daily at the…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 26, 2003 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. John Crane, Inc. (2003)

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 985, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 103, 928 P.2d 1181 (Richards) that controls here. In Richards, the Supreme Court had occasion to consider the interplay between Proposition 51 and…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · August 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Haney v. 3M Company (2015)

    …for Summary Judgment \[ECF No. 849\] is GRANTED. The Cross-Claim of Hopeman Brothers, Inc., Against Defendant Owens Illinois, Inc. \[ECF No. 687\] is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Judgment shall be entered by separate Order. SO ORDERED…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2007)

    …a preponderance of the evidence that in reasonable medical probability, this exposure was a substantial factor contributing to \[Cadlo's\] risk of developing the disease." "Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rodrigue v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2019)

    …for summary judgment, plaintiffs have either moved to dismiss or settled with the following defendants which were party to the Joint Defendants' motion: FMC Corporation,\[20\] Ingersoll-Rand Company,\[21\] McCarty Corporation,\[22\] Owens-Illinois, Inc.…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · February 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Sroka v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)

    …Paul Sroka, as plaintiffs. ECF No. 90-3. \[2\] The Plaintiffs also sued Union Carbide Corporation; John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.; Owens-Illinois Glass Company; E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc.; Hampshire Industries, Inc.; Universal Refractories Company; J…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2008 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. John Crane, Inc. (2008)

    …new 2003). We have reviewed the instructions given to the jury and conclude that there was no error. Our Supreme Court addressed the issue of causation in asbestos cases in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 12, 2003 · in the opinion

    Breaux v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)

    …Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp; Kelly Moore Paint Company; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.; Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing; North American Refractories Co.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Proko Industries; Quigley Company; Riley Stoker Corp.; The Synkoloid Company; T…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)

    …190 Cal.App.4th at p. 33.) Appellants rely on Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461 (Sparks) and Stewart to argue that John Crane did not bear its burden of providing…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …285). A. Threshold Exposure Plaintiff's claims require proof that Defendant caused or contributed to Donald Willis's exposure to asbestos. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 975 (1997) ("\[P\]laintiffs \[bear\] the…

  17. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · November 29, 2005 · in the opinion

    Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2005)

    …suit at this point, the claim would have been premature. Id. at 965 (emphasis supplied). This conclusion regarding prematurity is in accord with an earlier Mississippi case, Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards, 573 So.2d 704…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …A trial is the appropriate means to determine what obligations, if any, each Defendant owes to Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs have not shown that they cannot obtain complete relief from any Defendant without the absent parties. Second…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)

    821 Moreover, the plaintiff must show "the manufacturer's asbestos product was used at the specific site within the workplace where \[the plaintiff\] worked." Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …in the scope of \[the plaintiffs\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571 N.W.2d 530, 533 (Mich…