No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

21 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · December 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

    573 So.2d 704 (1990) OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; Pittsburgh Corning Corp.; Hopeman Brothers, Inc.; Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund; Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and Dmn Electric Supply Co., Inc. v. Charles Gavin EDWARDS. No. 90…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 3, 1997

    Anchor Packing Co. v. Grimshaw (1997)

    …reversed the judgment against Hopeman Brothers. It otherwise affirmed the judgments for the plaintiffs against Anchor and Owens-Corning. The Maryland cap on noneconomic damages applies to asbestos wrongful death claims arising after October 1, 1994…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)

    …to move. For example, this fluid makes it easier for the lungs to move during breathing." See American Cancer Society at http://www.cancer.org. As we noted in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343…

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 12, 2003 · in the opinion

    Breaux v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)

    …Fiberboard Corp.; Johns-Manville Sales Corp.; Philip Carey Corp.; Owens-Corning Fiberglass Company; and Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. as well. Plaintiffs settled the Texas litigation with all defendants except North American Refractories. Following jury trial, the jury…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 27, 2004

    Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries (2004)

    …trial court's ruling that Cichirillo's claim against Northrop Grumman (Avondale), Flintkote, Territo, Owens-Illinois, Uniroyal, Hopeman Brothers and Charles Johnson was prescribed, and remanded the case for further proceedings. A timely suit in a…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 2, 2017

    Savoie v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. (2017)

    Joseph Savoie sued in Louisiana state court, alleging he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working at the Avondale shipyard (now Huntington Ingalls) in various positions from about 1948 to 1996. He said he was exposed daily at the…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · August 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Haney v. 3M Company (2015)

    …for Summary Judgment \[ECF No. 849\] is GRANTED. The Cross-Claim of Hopeman Brothers, Inc., Against Defendant Owens Illinois, Inc. \[ECF No. 687\] is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Judgment shall be entered by separate Order. SO ORDERED…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · February 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Sroka v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)

    …Paul Sroka, as plaintiffs. ECF No. 90-3. \[2\] The Plaintiffs also sued Union Carbide Corporation; John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.; Owens-Illinois Glass Company; E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc.; Hampshire Industries, Inc.; Universal Refractories Company; J…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Broussard v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)

    …PRAC. & PROC.§ 3733 (Rev. 4th ed.)(citing Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 89 (2014)(in context of diversity removal, only a "plausible" allegation of amount in controversy is required))…

  11. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · November 29, 2005 · in the opinion

    Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2005)

    …suit at this point, the claim would have been premature. Id. at 965 (emphasis supplied). This conclusion regarding prematurity is in accord with an earlier Mississippi case, Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards, 573 So.2d 704…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)

    …user is later injured. See Davis, 975 F.2d at 173 (noting that "no Louisiana case has clearly addressed the issue" of whether a "product manufacturer owes \[a\] duty to the employee\[s\] of a purchaser. . …

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)

    …2:17-CV-12367. Before: JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.\[\\] This case is the latest in an ever-increasing line of cases brought by former Huntington Ingalls employees or their family members in…

  14. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    Lamorak Ins. Co. v. Kone, Inc. (2018)

    …to Kone for 1977 to 1985 count as excess insurance, and Lamorak owes nothing on those policies until Kone exhausts the limits of all applicable primary insurance. We must decide whether the Lamorak policies at issue…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 10, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …2d 1164, 1168 (La. 1991). Further, the same principal of limited shareholder liability "applies where one corporation wholly owns another." Bujol, 922 So. 2d at 1127. Courts may disregard the concept of corporate separateness, or "pierce…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Luca v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 15, 2022 · in the opinion

    Stansbury v. McCARTY Corporation (2022)

    …liability for injuries it caused to plaintiff). Accordingly, plaintiff has alleged that Hopeman Brothers owes a duty of care to plaintiff, the breach of which has caused the damage for which recovery is sought. See Ford…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2018 · in the opinion

    Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)

    …F.3d at 173). Remand is proper when defendants can show only that the government owns the relevant vessels and fails to produce evidence that the government distributed safety procedures regarding use of asbestos. See Bartel…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Germain v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 20, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …Fed. R. Evid. 702. But experts may not provide "legal conclusions or. . . simply tell the jury what result to reach." Owen v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 698 F.2d 236, 240 (5th Cir. 1983); McBroom v. Payne…