No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 8, 2022

    Sentilles v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2022)

    The court granted the unopposed summary judgment motions of Union Carbide, Amchem, Zurich (as alleged insurer of Marquette) and John Crane, and dismissed Sentilles's and Huntington Ingalls (Avondale)'s claims against them with prejudice. A…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 5, 2023

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2023)

    The court granted summary judgment to IMO, GE, Viacom and Union Carbide, dismissing all claims against them with prejudice, and denied Zurich's summary judgment motion as moot because Zurich had been dismissed from the case…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 30, 2023

    Ragusa v. Louisiana Guaranty Insurance Association (2023)

    Frank Ragusa, Jr. sued numerous companies in Louisiana state court in 2021 over asbestos exposure, alleging negligence and intentional torts; Avondale removed the case to federal court. Ragusa has mesothelioma. The opinion mentions his exposure to…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)

    …1974, but those policies are not relevant to this appeal. \[4\] The circuit court directed judgment in favor of Mitchell as to its cross-claims against Cross-Defendants Georgia Pacific LLC and Union Carbide Corporation. That…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 4, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …it.\[1\] The motion is opposed by defendants General Electric Co., Foster Wheeler LLC, and ViacomCBS, Inc.;\[2\] Union Carbide Corp. and BayerCropScience, Inc.;\[3\] and plaintiff Callen Cortez (collectively, the "opposing parties").\[4\] For the…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …that he knew that his father was working with asbestos-containing products, because plaintiff himself worked as an insulator, and recognized the fibers.\[19\] See Francis v. Union Carbide Corp., 116 So. 3d 858, 863 (La…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Courville v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2020)

    NELCOME JOSEPH COURVILLE, JR., v. LAMORAK INSURANCE COMPANY (AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO THE LIABILITY FOR POLICIES OF INSURANCE ISSUED BY COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, EMPLOYERS COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, AND AMERICAN EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY), ET…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    Zurich American v. Insurance Co. of North America (2019)

    …raised in a responsive pleading. Whether the pollution exclusion in INA's insurance policies is an affirmative defense is a question of Missouri state law. See First Union National Bank v. Pictet Overseas Trust Corp., LTD.…

  9. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · August 12, 2008 · in the opinion

    Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2008)

    …who was born in 1945, joined Local 33 of the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers (union) in 1967. After he joined the union, the plaintiff worked until 1985 as an insulator…

  10. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · November 27, 2007 · in the opinion

    Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2007)

    …who was born in 1945, joined Local 33 of the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers (union) in 1967. After he joined the union, the plaintiff worked until 1985 as an insulator…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · May 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Zurich American Insurance Company v. Insurance Company of North America (2018)

    …at 232. "A pro-rata allocation among insurers does not reduce their respective obligations to their insured." Id. (quoting Dart Indus., Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 52 P.3d 79, 87 (Cal. 2002)). Both Heartland…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 9, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …not recall precisely who his employer was, Cortez testified that he was engaged to work at Triad through his union membership in Local 102.\[29\] During his engagement at Triad, Cortez worked on one of Riley…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (2021)

    …such judicial involvement derives from Covil's status as a dissolved corporation in receivership and does not entitle the Zurich Settlement to absolute protection from production in litigation.\[8\] Allowing for limited disclosure under the circumstances…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 4, 2020 · in the opinion

    Zurich American Insurance Company v. Covil Corporation (2020)

    ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. COVIL CORPORATION, etal., Defendants. No. 1:18-CV-932. August 4, 2020. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CATHERINE C. EAGLES, District Judge. The…