No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 9, 2015

    Thomasson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)

    …Trane, FMC, General Electric, Foster Wheeler and CBS) against plaintiff Claire Thomasson, and denied MetLife's motion to dismiss without prejudice while allowing 45 days of added discovery. To recover in an asbestos case under New…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · February 25, 2019

    Harris v. CBS Corporation (2019)

    Michael Roy Harris and his wife Elsie sued CBS Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand (IR) and other companies in California state court in Alameda County. They brought personal injury and loss of consortium claims. Michael Harris has malignant mesothelioma,…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · October 3, 2017

    Devries v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2017)

    Roberta Devries and Shirley McAfee, widows of two deceased Navy veterans, sued several equipment manufacturers in Pennsylvania state court. They alleged their husbands contracted cancer from asbestos exposure on Navy ships, and in McAfee's case the…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 26, 2021

    Fowler v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc. (2021)

    …be told this. In multi-defendant asbestos cases, medical causation instructions must include the frequency, regularity and proximity test, not just a general proximate cause charge. Causation; Product Identification; Failure to Warn; Design Defect; Sophisticated User…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 10, 2025 · in the opinion

    Holste v. 3M Company (2025)

    …cv-09814-JLS-E. January 10, 2025. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge. (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 34) Before the Court is…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion

    Thrash v. Cirrus Enterprises, LLC (2017)

    …749 F.3d 1117, 1122 (9th Cir. 2014) ("We recognize that defendants enjoy much broader removal rights under the federal officer removal statute than they do under the general removal statute\[.\]"); Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp…