11 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 11, 2020 · in the opinion
Booker v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2020)
…included in the verdict form because they bear strict liability for his injuries. (See Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1187-1191 \[strict products liability applies to suppliers of raw…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Olson v. Brenntag N. AM. Inc. (2019)
…rely on Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v Ballard (749 So 2d 483 \[Fla 1999\]), in which the Florida Supreme Court affirmed a punitive-damages award based in part on post-injury statements by Owens-Corning and…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · March 31, 2023 · in the opinion
In re Ltl Management, LLC (2023)
…T\]he general expectation of state law and of the Bankruptcy Code ... is that courts respect entity separateness absent compelling circumstances calling equity ... into play." In re Owens Corning, 419 F.3d 195, 211 (3d Cir…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · January 30, 2023 · in the opinion
In re Ltl Management, LLC (2023)
…T\]he general expectation of state law and of the Bankruptcy Code ... is that courts respect entity separateness absent compelling circumstances calling equity ... into play." In re Owens Corning, 419 F.3d 195, 211 (3d Cir…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 1, 2023 · in the opinion
Chenet v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2023)
…Judge. APPEAL DISMISSED; CASE REMANDED. Lindsey A. Cheek, THE CHEEK LAW FIRM, 650 Poydras Street, Suite 2310, New Orleans, LA 70130, Lewis Owens Unglesby, Lance C. Unglesby, Adrian M. Simm, Jr., Jamie F. Gontarek, UNGLESBY LAW…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gibbons v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2020)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 5, 2021 · in the opinion
Leavitt v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)
…prejudicial error and affirm. BACKGROUND A. A plaintiff seeking to hold a manufacturer liable for asbestos-related latent injuries must satisfy a two-part causation test. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2017 · in the opinion
Alfaro v. Imerys Talc America Inc. (2017)
…would need to establish that this exposure was to a reasonable medical probability a substantial factor in contributing to any asbestos-related disease she suffered. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Matter of Crozier v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2018)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · July 16, 2019 · in the opinion
Shook v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…litigation. See J&J Memorandum in Support of Motion to Fix Venue, ECF No. 1-5 at 17 ("Debtors claim that J&J owes them a duty to defend." (citing 1989 Agreement § 11 & 2011 Agreement ¶ 6))…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2018 · in the opinion
Crozier v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …