No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

35 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 12, 2010

    Bush v. Eaton Corporation (2010)

    Oretha Mae Bush sued Eaton Corporation, its plant supervisor James Kinsner, and several other companies in Kentucky state court. She alleged negligence and strict liability for exposing her to asbestos fibers and causing mesothelioma. She died in…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 27, 2020

    In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products (2020)

    The court granted in part and denied in part Johnson & Johnson's motions to exclude plaintiffs' experts Saed, Longo and the general-causation experts, and denied plaintiffs' motions to exclude defense experts Diette, Saenz and Neel…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 2, 2018

    Matter of Crozier v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2018)

    …Avon's powder. They moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or on forum non conveniens grounds. The court found no general jurisdiction, since neither company was incorporated or based in New York. It found…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 27, 2018

    Brewer v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2018)

    …jurisdiction and on forum non conveniens grounds, arguing that everything happened in Minnesota. The court found no general jurisdiction, since neither company was incorporated or based in New York. It did find specific jurisdiction under New…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 31, 2017

    Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)

    …in California, asked to be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court agreed that it was not subject to general jurisdiction in Washington because it was not incorporated or headquartered there. On specific jurisdiction, the…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 22, 2019

    Olson v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …talcum powder, because the claim has an articulable nexus to that business. General jurisdiction was lacking because the defendants are not incorporated or headquartered in New York. Personal Jurisdiction consumer user of talcum powder 1953-2015

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 22, 2019

    Young v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiff's proof; conflicting expert affidavits on general and specific causation raise issues of fact for trial, and plaintiffs need only show facts from which liability may reasonably…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 3, 2018

    Hooper-Lynch v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …New York, transacts business here with an articulable nexus to the claim, supporting specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1) even though there is no general jurisdiction. Personal Jurisdiction user of cosmetic talc powder 1968-1985

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · July 10, 2018

    Stevenson v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (2018)

    …in part that the Florida federal court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The plaintiff conceded there was no general jurisdiction and argued for specific jurisdiction. She relied on the predecessor's Florida business registration and registered…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · April 9, 2020

    Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am. (2020)

    …can support specific causation. Where the trial court effectively apportioned 0% to settling defendants who were left off the verdict sheet, General Obligations Law § 15-108 offsets are computed by the aggregate method. Causation; Product Identification…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 6, 2018

    Black v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …and Cyprus Amax Minerals, moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and on forum non conveniens grounds. The court found no general jurisdiction, because both companies are incorporated and based elsewhere. It found specific jurisdiction…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017

    Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)

    …employees or agents in Washington. The plaintiffs argued that WCD sold talc to Johnson & Johnson for nationwide distribution in cosmetic products. The court found no general jurisdiction, which the plaintiffs did not dispute. On specific jurisdiction…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 4, 2018

    Shulman v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …as to Imerys. Imerys is a Delaware corporation based in California, so New York had no general jurisdiction over it. The court nonetheless found specific jurisdiction under New York's long-arm statute. In interrogatory answers…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 9, 2014

    Hasenberg v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)

    …not make clear which defendants were sued in which counts, the court dismissed it without prejudice and ordered an amended complaint by May 9, 2014. It also noted general personal jurisdiction standards for a later motion.

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 21, 2019

    Hernandez v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …plaintiff's proof; it must make a prima facie showing that its product could not have contributed to the illness, and conflicting expert evidence on general and specific causation raises fact issues. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019

    Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)

    …non-diverse defendant in state court; under New York's lenient pleading standard, general allegations of manufacture and a disputed contract-specifications defense did not meet that burden. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Branson v. American International Industries (2016)

    …defense: We are of opinion that the privilege is of such a nature that it must be asserted at latest before the expiration of the period allotted for entering a general appearance and challenging the merits…

  18. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · October 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    In re Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2021)

    …or the vote accepting the Plan).\[65\] Rather, he relies on a one page general "Attorney Agreement" which provides that Mr. Bevan can vote on behalf of his client in a bankruptcy case filed by any…

  19. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · September 11, 2019 · in the opinion

    Huff v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company (2019)

    …307, 310 (1999): The general rule of corporate-successor liability is that when a company sells its assets to another company, the acquiring company is not liable for the debts and liabilities of the selling company…

  20. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 28, 2021 · in the opinion

    Lanzo v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company (2021)

    …Ibid. It held that, because the defendants had general knowledge of the rollover problem, they "had notice of potential relevance to this and other litigation involving their product." Ibid. Because the evidence of destruction of raw…