- Organization: Ingersoll-Rand Company
- Organization: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
- Clear filters
31 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · February 9, 2001
Boldini v. Owens Corning (2001)
…judgment for Sprinkmann Sons Corporation of Illinois and remanded, holding the construction statute of repose did not bar plaintiffs' claims based on Sprinkmann's sale and distribution of asbestos products. The Illinois construction statute of repose…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · November 10, 2015
Sydow v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2015)
The court found Owens-Illinois' motion to dismiss moot, denied 3M's and Weyerhaeuser's motions to join it, and granted Theresa Sydow's motion to file a third amended complaint substituting her as special administrator…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · August 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Boyer v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2014)
Strict Liability Plaintiffs' strict liability claim against Owens-Illinois is similarly flawed. To impose strict liability under Wisconsin law, the defendant must be "engaged in the business" of selling the alleged defective product. Geboy v. TRL…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 31, 2012
Menssen v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2012)
Jayne Menssen sued Abex and Honeywell (as successor to Bendix), among others, over pleural mesothelioma she attributed to asbestos exposure while working at Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UNARCO) from 1967 to 1969. She claimed they conspired…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 24, 2015
Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2015)
…A.W. Chesterton back to state court. The court rejected Union Carbide's argument that its cross-claim against Owens-Illinois created federal jurisdiction. It still kept the state-law claims under supplemental jurisdiction. Discovery was…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 22, 2011 · in the opinion
Sabol v. Allied Glove Corp. (2011)
…Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand Corporation, I.U. North America, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Plotkin Brothers Supply, Inc., Premier Refractories, Inc., Safety First Industries, Inc., and United States Steel Corporation, v…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)
…encompass the issue whether Whitmire had been sufficiently exposed to asbestos due to Bechtel's conduct to conclude that Bechtel asbestos was a "substantial factor" in causing Whitmire's mesothelioma. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., supra…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…Dkt. No. 418 at 5. But Plaintiffs bear the burden of establishing that exposure to Defendants' products was a substantial factor causing his illness. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 982 (Cal…
-
Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024 · in the opinion
Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)
…dust." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506 (1996); see also id. at 506 n.2 (describing the medical field's study of mesothelioma and conclusions about its relation to asbestos); Owens-Illinois…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)
…by E. John Litchfield, Berrigan & Litchfield, LLC, Kathy L. Torregano, Berrigan & Litchfield, LLC & Michael J. Marsiglia, Berrigan & Litchfield, LLC. Owens Illinois, Inc, Cross Defendant, represented by Walter G. Watkins, III, Forman, Watkins, & Krutz, LLP, Elizabeth Riddell…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 27, 2002 · in the opinion
Madden v. Able Supply Co. (2002)
…Houston, TX, for North American Refractories Co., defendant. Randolph L Burns, Baker & Botts, Dallas, TX, for Owens-Illinois, Inc., defendant. Thomas F Dougall, Bowers Orr et al, Columbia, SC, for Proko Industries, defendant. Robert H Bass…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 25, 2016 · in the opinion
Campbell v. AO Smith Corporation (2016)
…AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO ALLIANCE MACHINE COMPANY; NAGLE PUMPS, INC; OAKFABCO, INC.; OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY, AND ITS DIVISION FERRO ENGINEERING; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; PHELPS DODGE INDUSTRIES, INC; POWELL VALVE COMPANY; POWER PIPING; PREMIER REFRACTORIES, INC.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…that the California Supreme Court has not yet determined whether an "every exposure" theory of liability is consistent with the substantial factor test that applies in asbestos cases. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Kilty v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2018)
…Feb. 19, 2016), aff'd sub nom. Pecher v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 859 F.3d 396 (7th Cir. 2017) (requiring that asbestos exposure be a "substantial contributing factor" to mesothelioma diagnosis). However, none of those issues…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · October 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Polanco v. Asbestos Corp., Inc. (2007)
…its answer, if the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, the date of the motion, and on which date the defendant was dismissed. Owens-Illinois Corp., Inc. 5/12/03 8/17/06 Pfizer, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Hasenberg v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…over WCD in Illinois, because WCD is a New Jersey corporation with a Connecticut principal place of business, WCD owns no property in Illinois, WCD has no offices in Illinois, WCD has no employees in Illinois…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…A trial is the appropriate means to determine what obligations, if any, each Defendant owes to Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs have not shown that they cannot obtain complete relief from any Defendant without the absent parties. Second…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent without unduly restricting or expanding a statute's coverage beyond its intended scope." Howard, 504 S.W.3d at 269 (quoting Owens v. State…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 14, 2019 · in the opinion
Walker v. Blackmer Pump Co. (2019)
…Owens testified that Decedent probably worked on every electrical system on the U.S.S. Plymouth Rock. Further, Mr. Owens stated that Decedent spent roughly fifty-percent of his two-years aboard the U.S.S…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)
…attach to defendant); Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162 (4th Cir. 1986) (same); Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Co., 726 F. Supp. 172, 174 (W.D. Mich. 1989) (same). F. John Crane…