- Organization: Insurance Company of North America
- Organization: Century Indemnity Company
- Clear filters
9 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 2, 1994
Atkinson v. Celotex Corp. (1994)
…no manifest error or abuse of discretion, so the nine plaintiffs who appealed (or their heirs) and Faye Myers did not get higher damages or a consortium award against Owens-Illinois, Keene and INA. A jury…
-
Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion
Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)
…cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1109 (1981) (following Forty-Eight Insulations and prorating liability among insurers that provided coverage during the period the injured party was exposed to asbestos); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 4, 1978
Ins. Co. of No. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations (1978)
…This rejected the manifestation theory urged by INA, Affiliated FM, Illinois National and Liberty Mutual. Under occurrence-based liability policies, asbestos-related bodily injury occurs when fibers injure lung tissue after exposure, not when disease manifests…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · May 28, 1992 · in the opinion
Cole v. Celotex Corp. (1992)
…contribution claims, the trial judge in Champagne relied upon the Fifth Circuit's holding in Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 528 So.2d 716 (La.App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, 531…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002
Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)
…sued its liability and property insurers in Connecticut federal court, seeking a declaration that its policies covered what it spent to deal with lead and asbestos in buildings it owns. Several insurers moved for summary judgment…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion
Zurich American v. Insurance Co. of North America (2019)
…pollution exclusion applies in this case, then INA owes no coverage for the Cotter suit and ZAIC could not seek contribution or subrogation against INA as a matter of law. ZAIC responds that INA failed to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Congoleum Corporation (2009)
…Litigation Congoleum is a manufacturer of floor tile and other products based in Mercerville, New Jersey. The company owns and operates four plants, two of which are located in New Jersey, and employs approximately 600 employees…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Congoleum Corp. (2009)
…Litigation Congoleum is a manufacturer of floor tile and other products based in Mercerville, New Jersey. The company owns and operates four plants, two of which are located in New Jersey, and employs approximately 600 employees…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion
Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)
…than one insurer will be triggered. Because each insurer is fully liable, and because Keene cannot collect more than it owes in damages, the issue of dividing insurance obligations arises. The only logical resolution of this…