No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

17 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)

    Felton Robichaux sued Avondale (Huntington Ingalls) and many other companies in Louisiana state court, alleging he developed mesothelioma, diagnosed in January 2022, from asbestos exposure. He alleged he worked at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)

    Felton Robichaux sued Huntington Ingalls (Avondale) and many other defendants in Louisiana state court. He alleged he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to 1979 as a carpenter and insulator.…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 2, 1994

    Atkinson v. Celotex Corp. (1994)

    …Service Refinery approximately 35 years; electrician Cities Service Refinery 22 years; various crafts Cities Service Refinery 18 years; pipe fitter Cities Service Refinery 35 years; general craft foreman Cities Service Refinery 32 years; laborer Cities Service…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002 · in the opinion

    Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)

    …In that case, the court concluded that repair and replacement costs incurred by the insured on account of damage to electrical transformers caused by a design defect were not "ensuing losses." Id. In support of its…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 29, 2015

    Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2015)

    …of asbestos knowledge, the Walsh-Healey Act, specific risk percentages, life expectancy, and general symptoms and quality of life, plus an unlisted 1956 article. It also struck his rebuttal report to Dr. Stockman. It kept the…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 30, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)

    \[131\] There are two exceptions to the general rule that would allow creditors to proceed against the debtor for the post-petition interest: (1) when a creditor is oversecured under § 506(b); and (2) under § 726…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 11, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)

    Moreover, the General Growth Properties Court relied on several equitable considerations in arriving at its decision, including that the default rate would not constitute a "penalty" to the "exceedingly solvent" debtor, a lack of misconduct, and…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · September 12, 1991

    Mitchell, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty (1991)

    …the insured, was entitled to a defense and indemnity because coverage is triggered at least by exposure to its asbestos products during the policy period. Under a standard form comprehensive general liability policy, "bodily injury" from…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · January 30, 1981

    Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of No. America (1981)

    …Liberty), holding that coverage is triggered by exposure to asbestos, and denied Aetna's challenge to jurisdiction. Under occurrence-based general liability policies, coverage for asbestosis, mesothelioma and bronchogenic carcinoma is triggered by the claimant's…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · May 28, 1992 · in the opinion

    Cole v. Celotex Corp. (1992)

    …the Tab?, 48 Fordham L.Rev. 657, 684 n. 152 (1980) (quoting Elliott, The New Comprehensive General Liability Policy, in Liability Insurance Disputes 12-3, 12-5 (S. Schreiber ed. 1968)); See also Nothstein, Toxic Torts…

  11. Court case · Montana Supreme Court · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion

    Maryland Cas. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Court (2020)

    …and through it, the general public." He expressed particular concern the Mill workers' union or local attorneys could become aware of the scope of the lung damage issues at the Mill. ¶76 Larrick also informed Hopkins…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)

    …INSURANCE LAW—INDEMNITY—COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY POLICIES—APPORTIONMENT—PRO RATA—TRIGGER OF COVERAGE—INJURY-IN-FACT TRIGGER—CONTINUOUS TRIGGER The Court of Appeals held that damages from a continuous bodily injury judgment must be allocated on…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 20, 1984 · in the opinion

    JT Thorp, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1984)

    …had progressed, but doctors decided against attempting surgery. Butler remains in general good health and bicycles daily. The sole medical opinion concluded that Butler was not disabled as of the time of the opinion, but annual…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)

    …Jaeger 1959). An insurance contract represents an exchange of an uncertain loss for a certain loss. In a comprehensive general liability insurance policy, the uncertain loss is the possibility of incurring legal liability, and the certain…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 4, 1978 · in the opinion

    Ins. Co. of No. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations (1978)

    …lawsuits. D. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Cases dealing with statute of limitation issues are not applicable to this coverage problem. See, Tijsseling v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp., Ltd., 55 Cal.App.3d 623, 127 Cal…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Morvant v. Maryland Casualty Company (2014)

    …2010) (Duval, J.). In RepublicBank, the Fifth Circuit considered state and federal actions involving the same general subject matter and sharing a common issue, the validity of a promissory note. 828 F.2d at 1121. The…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    Zurich American v. Insurance Co. of North America (2019)

    …indistinctness, or uncertainty in the meaning of the language in the policy. Language is ambiguous if it is reasonably open to different interpretations." Seeck v. Geico General Ins. Co., 212 S.W.3d 129, 132 (Mo…