No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 5, 2023

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2023)

    Felton Robichaux worked as an insulator and carpenter at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to 1979 and alleged he was exposed to asbestos there. He first sued in 1999 with thousands of other plaintiffs and settled with GE, IMO and Viacom. After he was…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rodrigue v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2019)

    …to the Joint Defendants' motion.\[17\] Plaintiffs opposed summary judgment for only three of the Joint Defendants: General Electric Company; Foster Wheeler, LLC; and CBS Corporation.\[18\] But on April 11, 2019, plaintiffs, General Electric Company…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion

    Legendre v. Louisiana Ins. Guaranty Association (2024)

    …a role in causing the deceased's asbestos exposure, including, but not limited to: Hopeman Brothers, Inc., International Paper Company, Paramount Global, General Electric Company, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Bayer Cropscience, Inc., Foster-Wheeler, LLC, Uniroyal, Inc.…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 2, 1994

    Atkinson v. Celotex Corp. (1994)

    …Service Refinery approximately 35 years; electrician Cities Service Refinery 22 years; various crafts Cities Service Refinery 18 years; pipe fitter Cities Service Refinery 35 years; general craft foreman Cities Service Refinery 32 years; laborer Cities Service…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002 · in the opinion

    Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)

    …In that case, the court concluded that repair and replacement costs incurred by the insured on account of damage to electrical transformers caused by a design defect were not "ensuing losses." Id. In support of its…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · January 30, 1981

    Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of No. America (1981)

    …Liberty), holding that coverage is triggered by exposure to asbestos, and denied Aetna's challenge to jurisdiction. Under occurrence-based general liability policies, coverage for asbestosis, mesothelioma and bronchogenic carcinoma is triggered by the claimant's…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · May 28, 1992 · in the opinion

    Cole v. Celotex Corp. (1992)

    …the Tab?, 48 Fordham L.Rev. 657, 684 n. 152 (1980) (quoting Elliott, The New Comprehensive General Liability Policy, in Liability Insurance Disputes 12-3, 12-5 (S. Schreiber ed. 1968)); See also Nothstein, Toxic Torts…

  8. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · August 12, 2008 · in the opinion

    Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2008)

    …the previous disability and the second injury which is materially and substantially greater than the disability that would have resulted from the second injury alone," which would have entitled him to full compensation under General Statutes …

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)

    …INSURANCE LAW—INDEMNITY—COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY POLICIES—APPORTIONMENT—PRO RATA—TRIGGER OF COVERAGE—INJURY-IN-FACT TRIGGER—CONTINUOUS TRIGGER The Court of Appeals held that damages from a continuous bodily injury judgment must be allocated on…

  10. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · November 27, 2007 · in the opinion

    Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2007)

    …the previous disability and the second injury which is materially and substantially greater than the disability that would have resulted from the second injury alone," which would have entitled him to full compensation under General Statutes …

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    Polar-Mohr Maschinenvertriebsgesellschaft Gmbh, Co. KG v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2018)

    …concluded. . . that pro rata coverage would be more fair and equitable when compared to all sums allocation, we are constrained by the language of the applicable policies"); see also Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indem. Co.…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 20, 1984 · in the opinion

    JT Thorp, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1984)

    …had progressed, but doctors decided against attempting surgery. Butler remains in general good health and bicycles daily. The sole medical opinion concluded that Butler was not disabled as of the time of the opinion, but annual…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Finch v. Covil Corporation (2020)

    …nature of Mr. White's representation. \[5\] Section 33-14-107(b) requires that the notice "(1) be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the dissolved corporation's principal office. …

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)

    …Jaeger 1959). An insurance contract represents an exchange of an uncertain loss for a certain loss. In a comprehensive general liability insurance policy, the uncertain loss is the possibility of incurring legal liability, and the certain…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 4, 1978 · in the opinion

    Ins. Co. of No. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations (1978)

    …lawsuits. D. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Cases dealing with statute of limitation issues are not applicable to this coverage problem. See, Tijsseling v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp., Ltd., 55 Cal.App.3d 623, 127 Cal…

  16. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Courville v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2020)

    …Inc. ("Eagle") and One Beacon, its commercial general liability (CGL) insurer named as a defendant by the plaintiff, brought a third-party claim against another CGL insurer, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company ("USF&G") seeking…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (2021)

    …cross-claims, Covil asserted counterclaims against Zurich and cross-claims against Sentry, USF&G, TIG, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company ("Hartford"), "each of \[which\] issued general liability policies to Covil" (Docket Entry 155, ¶ 109). (Id., ¶…

  18. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · November 22, 2023 · in the opinion

    Protopapas v. Wall, Templeton & Haldrup, PA (2023)

    …20, 26, 630 S.E.2d 474, 477 (2006). In the civil context, there are three general exceptions to the mootness doctrine. First, an appellate court can take jurisdiction, despite mootness, if the issue raised is…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Morvant v. Maryland Casualty Company (2014)

    …2010) (Duval, J.). In RepublicBank, the Fifth Circuit considered state and federal actions involving the same general subject matter and sharing a common issue, the validity of a promissory note. 828 F.2d at 1121. The…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · July 16, 2019 · in the opinion

    Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas (2019)

    …P. 12(b)(7)). The decision under Rule 19(a) has to be made in terms of the general policies of avoiding multiple litigation, providing the parties with complete and effective relief in a single action…