No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

19 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · May 5, 2016

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    Charles Arbogast, Jr., and his wife Barbara sued twenty-seven companies, alleging that as manufacturers or distributors of various products they exposed him to asbestos and caused his mesothelioma. The complaint raised strict liability, negligence,…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 17, 2016

    Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2016)

    Jesse Frank Sheppard sued in Louisiana state court, and the case was removed to federal court. He alleged he was exposed to asbestos daily while working for Freeport Sulphur Company, now part of Mosaic Global Holdings, and that it caused…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 26, 2016

    Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2016)

    Jesse Frank Sheppard sued in Louisiana state court, alleging he was exposed to asbestos daily while working for Freeport Sulphur Company, now Mosaic's predecessor. He alleged this caused asbestos-related cancer, lung cancer, or mesothelioma, first…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 30, 2017

    Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2017)

    …This order dealt only with Liberty Mutual, which had issued workers' compensation and general liability policies to Mosaic. Sheppard claimed Liberty Mutual took on a duty for workplace safety by inspecting Mosaic's facilities and advising…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 24, 2017

    Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2017)

    Jesse Frank Sheppard sued in Louisiana state court, alleging he worked in various positions for Freeport Sulphur Company, Mosaic's predecessor, and was exposed to asbestos daily. He said the exposure caused asbestos-related cancer, lung cancer,…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 2, 2017

    Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2017)

    Jesse Frank Sheppard sued his former employer, Freeport Sulphur Company (whose successor is Mosaic), along with makers and distributors of asbestos-containing products and related insurers. He alleged that daily asbestos exposure at work caused lung…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 8, 2024

    Constanza v. Sparta Insurance Company (2024)

    Erica Dandry Constanza and Monica Dandry Haller sued Avondale (Huntington Ingalls), Hopeman Brothers and other companies in Louisiana state court. They said Michael P. Dandry, Jr. was exposed to asbestos while working at Avondale for about two and a…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 24, 2017

    Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2017)

    Jesse Frank Sheppard sued Mosaic Global Holdings, the successor to his former employer Freeport Sulphur Company, along with product makers and insurers. He alleged daily asbestos exposure at Freeport and said it caused asbestos-related cancer, lung…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 2, 2017

    Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2017)

    Jesse Frank Sheppard sued in Louisiana state court, and the case was removed to federal court in New Orleans. He alleged daily asbestos exposure while working for Freeport Sulphur Company, a predecessor of defendant Mosaic. He also sued makers and…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)

    …General Electric ("GE"), denied manufacturing any turbines used at the jobsites, and the estate failed to rebut this assertion. Id. at 575. While GE admitted that a "small percentage" of electrical wires and cables contained a…

  11. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007

    Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)

    James Henderson, a North Carolina resident, and his wife sued several manufacturers in South Carolina. They claimed he developed mesothelioma from asbestos-containing products he encountered working for many years as a boilermaker, pipefitter and…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 31, 2020

    Marsh v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2020)

    …and ports who alleges the defendant supplied asbestos products to those sites has shown prima facie personal jurisdiction and stated a plausible products liability claim under general maritime law (Restatement (Second) of Torts 402A). Design Defect…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020

    Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)

    …a jury found Ethyl, International Paper and Owens-Illinois liable. It awarded $7.5 million in general damages plus $250,661.45 in medical expenses. Judgment against Ethyl was $2,583,553.82, its share after…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 25, 2017 · in the opinion

    All Craft Fabricators, Inc. v. Atc Assoc., Inc. (2017)

    …asbestos event occurred at the facility whereby wooden doors and panels from the United Nations construction project were ordered by the owner and general contractor to be reworked and finished by All Craft at the facility…

  15. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · September 4, 2002 · in the opinion

    Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. (2002)

    …2d at 1272, n. 12. As we noted in Walls, this general rule is codified in La. Civ.Code art. 6, which also provides the exceptions thereto: In the absence of contrary legislative expression, substantive laws…

  16. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · September 25, 2001 · in the opinion

    International Paper Co. v. Labour & Indus. Rev. Com'n (2001)

    …9. In this case, neither party specifically addresses whether and to what extent these four factors have been established. Our general review of the case suggests that factors one, three and four are satisfied. Furthermore, it…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 27, 2006 · in the opinion

    Hopkins v. Plant Insulation Company (2006)

    …at 1079. Like federal habeas law, federal bankruptcy law creates exceptions to the general rule of federal deference to state court judgments by empowering bankruptcy courts to avoid or modify state judgments. Id. For certain bankruptcy…

  18. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 3, 2012 · in the opinion

    Calewarts v. CR Meyer and Sons Company (2012)

    …85 N.W.2d 772 (1957). As a general rule, an owner "is deemed to have constructive notice of a defect or unsafe condition when that defect or condition has existed a long enough time for…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · July 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)

    …the place of conduct factor does not favor one state over another because the alleged conduct is spread over multiple states. See, e.g, Patten v. General Motors Corp., Chevrolet Motor Div., 699 F. Supp. 1500…