No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)

    …McGowan Spinelli, Hanna & Reber, L.L.P., Robert N. Spinelli, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli Hanna & Reber, L.L.P., for Appellee, Union Carbide Corporation. Edward R. Paul, Paul, Flandreau & Berger, LLP, T. Peyton Smith, Forman, Watkins…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 8, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constanza v. Sparta Insurance Company (2024)

    …See Rec. Doc 11-1 at 3-8. \[72\] See id. \[73\] Meadows, 88 F.4th at 1335. \[74\] Id. \[75\] See, e.g., Ditcharo v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. 23-7399, 2024 WL…

  3. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 3, 2012 · in the opinion

    Calewarts v. CR Meyer and Sons Company (2012)

    …warnings or instructions about asbestos were given until sometime after 1985. The asbestos was never encapsulated and remained a subject of union bargaining discussions until the plant closed. Calewarts's witnesses did not observe abatement work…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Uzee v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2018)

    …Courington, Kiefer & Sommers, LLC & Troy Nathan Bell, Courington, Kiefer & Sommers, LLC. McCarty Corporation, Successor to McCarty-Branton, Inc and Predecessor and successor to McCarty Insulation Sales, Inc & Eagle, Inc., formerly known as Eagle Asbestos & Packing Co…

  5. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · September 4, 2002 · in the opinion

    Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. (2002)

    …injury" caused by the inhalation of the asbestos is the "superior interpretation of the contract provisions." Forty-Eight Insulations, 633 F.2d at 1223. Cole, 599 So.2d at 1077 (quoting Commercial Union Ins. Co. v…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · July 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)

    …the state of domicile is the one concerned with administration of estates, including the adequacy of compensation to the beneficiaries"). IPC is a Delaware corporation. IPC conducted business in the state of Oklahoma through its predecessor…