No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

17 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 8, 2024

    Constanza v. Sparta Insurance Company (2024)

    Erica Dandry Constanza and Monica Dandry Haller sued Avondale (Huntington Ingalls), Hopeman Brothers and other companies in Louisiana state court. They said Michael P. Dandry, Jr. was exposed to asbestos while working at Avondale for about two and a…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · February 19, 2016 · in the opinion

    Boyer v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2016)

    …INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. BRIAN HECKEL, Individually and as Special Administrator on behalf of the Estate of Sharon Heckel, Plaintiff, v. CBS CORP., GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, and WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Defendants. DIANNE JACOBS, Individually…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Boyer v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2016)

    …WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Defendant. BRIAN HECKEL, Individually and as Special Administrator on behalf of the Estate of Sharon Heckel, Plaintiff, v. CBS CORP., GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, and WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Defendants. DIANNE JACOBS, Individually…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)

    …General Electric ("GE"), denied manufacturing any turbines used at the jobsites, and the estate failed to rebut this assertion. Id. at 575. While GE admitted that a "small percentage" of electrical wires and cables contained a…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 27, 2020

    Hill v. Mallinckrodt LLC (2020)

    The district court denied Mallinckrodt's Rule 12(b)(7) motion to dismiss for failure to join the settled general contractors, so the executor's wrongful-death suit proceeds. A party is not a required party…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 31, 2020

    Marsh v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2020)

    …and ports who alleges the defendant supplied asbestos products to those sites has shown prima facie personal jurisdiction and stated a plausible products liability claim under general maritime law (Restatement (Second) of Torts 402A). Design Defect…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020

    Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)

    …a jury found Ethyl, International Paper and Owens-Illinois liable. It awarded $7.5 million in general damages plus $250,661.45 in medical expenses. Judgment against Ethyl was $2,583,553.82, its share after…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 2, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weyerhaeuser Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (2008)

    …2008) WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, and OLD REPUBLIC…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · March 7, 2016

    Pecher v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2016)

    …while evidence of occupational exposure and workers' compensation is limited or kept out of the liability phase. General, unspecific requests to exclude expert testimony or untimely evidence are denied without prejudice to specific objections. Expert Testimony…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 25, 2017 · in the opinion

    All Craft Fabricators, Inc. v. Atc Assoc., Inc. (2017)

    …asbestos event occurred at the facility whereby wooden doors and panels from the United Nations construction project were ordered by the owner and general contractor to be reworked and finished by All Craft at the facility…

  11. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · September 4, 2002 · in the opinion

    Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. (2002)

    …2d at 1272, n. 12. As we noted in Walls, this general rule is codified in La. Civ.Code art. 6, which also provides the exceptions thereto: In the absence of contrary legislative expression, substantive laws…

  12. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · September 25, 2001 · in the opinion

    International Paper Co. v. Labour & Indus. Rev. Com'n (2001)

    …9. In this case, neither party specifically addresses whether and to what extent these four factors have been established. Our general review of the case suggests that factors one, three and four are satisfied. Furthermore, it…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · June 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Kilty v. Weyerhaeuser Co. (2018)

    …page in each of their opposition briefs responding to this argument, the bulk of which amounts to broad, general references to their experts' testimony. Moreover, plaintiffs utterly fail to engage with defendant's specific arguments challenging…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · August 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Boyer v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2014)

    …of action and actual damages). \[4\] To the extent plaintiffs rely on general allegations of asbestos exposure from landfills or in the air within the larger community — in other words, exposure entirely unrelated to his employment…

  15. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 3, 2012 · in the opinion

    Calewarts v. CR Meyer and Sons Company (2012)

    …85 N.W.2d 772 (1957). As a general rule, an owner "is deemed to have constructive notice of a defect or unsafe condition when that defect or condition has existed a long enough time for…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 17, 2018 · in the opinion

    Kilty v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2018)

    …nor in the Seventh Circuit's general "affirm\[ance of\] the multiple rulings of the district court dismissing the claims against both defendants on appeal and denying reconsideration," suggested that court was taking a harder line…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · July 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)

    …the place of conduct factor does not favor one state over another because the alleged conduct is spread over multiple states. See, e.g, Patten v. General Motors Corp., Chevrolet Motor Div., 699 F. Supp. 1500…