9 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 16, 2016
George v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…County state court. Even assuming consent-by-registration survives Daimler, Pennsylvania's registration statute limits general jurisdiction to acts occurring during the period of registration, so a registration that began after the alleged injury does not…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 13, 2016 · in the opinion
Murray v. Dana Companies (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…Thomen, Esq., (860) 275-6700, [email protected]., for General Electric Company. Matthew C. Oleyer, Esq., (617) 217-5500, [email protected]., for General Insulation Company. Jason Caron, Esq., (781) 556-0600, [email protected]., for…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion
Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)
…conclusion about the scope of this duty and explicitly disapproved Campbell. (Kesner, at p. 1156.) "The \general rule' of duty in California is established by statute." (Kuciemba v. Victory Woodworks, Inc. (2023) 14 Cal.5th 993…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 27, 1996 · in the opinion
Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1996)
…requirements of predominance and superiority. In In re General Motors Corp. Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation, 55 F.3d 768 (3d Cir.) \[Hereinafter GM Trucks\], cert. denied sub nom. General Motors Corp. v…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Paulus v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2017)
…so by letter brief, and they have done so. Appellant argues the court retains jurisdiction under the general authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 128 (courts have power to "compel obedience to its judgments, orders…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 14, 2016 · in the opinion
Warren v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2016)
…plaintiff cites to general cases holding that evidence is a procedural issue and is thus governed by the forum state.\[8\] Plaintiff also cites the statement in People v Greenburg (50 AD3d 195 \[1st Dept 2008…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)
…litigant to rely on abstract generalities, but must instruct in specific terms that relate the party's [\1088] theory to the particular case." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 572 \[34 Cal…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 16, 2008 · in the opinion
Bednar v. Dana Corp. (2008)
…provides, in pertinent part, as follows: The amendment provides a general rule that each party shall be entitled to four peremptory challenges, but gives the Court two alternatives to achieve "a fair distribution of challenges". First…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)
…Corp. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 1222, 1231 (Casey).) In Casey, the plaintiff accused the defendant, a general contractor, of exposing him to asbestos at jobsites where the plaintiff worked for a subcontractor. (Id. at p…