6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · January 25, 1985
Rocco v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1985)
The Third Circuit affirmed the verdicts against Johns-Manville and Pittsburgh Corning and the denial of new trial and JNOV, but held that payments from non-joint-tortfeasor (Group A) settlements should not reduce the verdict…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 3, 1982
Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1982)
Carman Staiano sued a group of asbestos product makers, including Johns-Manville, Owens-Corning and Celotex, for personal injuries. His wife, Rita, sued for loss of consortium. He alleged he was exposed to asbestos dust from…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 20, 1985
Lowe v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1985)
Eugene Lowe and his wife sued a group of asbestos companies in 1982 over injuries from his work exposure to asbestos. Lowe died in September 1982, and his co-administrators were substituted as plaintiffs. He had worked at various times from 1942 at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 15, 1981 · in the opinion
Tysenn v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)
…Industries, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Pacor, Inc., Celotex Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, and Keene Corporation, Defendants, and Fibreboard Corp., Garlock, Inc., Unarco, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Third-Party Defendants. Civ. A…
-
Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · April 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Kinseth v. WEIL-McLAIN Company (2017)
…recovery under the statute of repose, as the products were permanent additions to real property. See Buttz v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 557 N.W.2d 90, 91 (Iowa 1996). Therefore, we reverse the district court…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986
Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
The Ninth Circuit reversed the judgment entered on a jury verdict for Owens-Illinois and remanded for a new trial, ruling for Kisor's estate, because the district court wrongly admitted evidence of the manufacturer's…