Search

• Organization: Johns-Manville Corp. ×
• Organization: Southern Asbestos Company ×
• Clear filters

7 results for “General Electric”

1. Company document · Motley 1000 · December 1, 1959

   Southern Asbestos Company General Conveyance and Assumption of Liabilities to H. K. Porter (1959)

   …s legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows: 3-page document entitled "General Conveyance and Assumption of Liabilities" of the Southern Asbestos Company by H.K. Porter…

2. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · January 10, 1985

   White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1985)

   …barred. The court answered yes. Washington's statutes do not say when a claim accrues, so the general discovery rule applies. A survivor takes the decedent's rights, including the benefit of the discovery rule. Whether…

3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986

   Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

   …in the 1940s and 1950s, and argued that it could not be liable for a danger it did not know about. The jury returned a general verdict for Owens-Illinois. The Ninth Circuit, applying Washington law…

4. Court case · Minnesota Supreme Court · May 14, 1982 · in the opinion

   DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co. (1982)

   …the court concluded that because the tolling provisions of the general limitations statute were in existence prior to the enactment of the wrongful death statute the legislature "could not possibly have had in mind that the…

5. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · April 19, 2017 · in the opinion

   Kinseth v. WEIL-McLAIN Company (2017)

   …Hellman, P.L.C., Waterloo, for plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appellants. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Richard E. Mull, Assistant Attorney General, for intervenor. Heard by Mullins, P.J., and Bower and McDonald, JJ. BOWER, Judge…

6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion

   White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

   …admiralty jurisdiction and rejected claims under the Extension of Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 740, or the general maritime law, 28 U.S.C. § 1333, because the alleged injuries bore no reasonable relationship to traditional…

7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 3, 1982 · in the opinion

   Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1982)

   …Pa.R.App.P. 301(a). Appellants acknowledge the general rule that an issue not argued below may not be argued on appeal, but nevertheless assert that their argument is not waived. They say: [\293] The…