No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

16 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · April 25, 1989 · in the opinion

    Anjeski v. Keene Bldg. & Development Co. (1989)

    …to a directed verdict because with the former the evidence has yet to be fully developed. See Pierce v. Ford Motor Company, 190 F.2d 910 (CA 4 1951); but see 10 Federal Practice and Procedure…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion

    White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

    …v. United Fruit Company, 365 U.S. 731, 81 S.Ct. 886, 6 L.Ed.2d 56 (1961); Sanderlin v. Old Dominion Stevedoring Corporation, 385 F.2d 79 (4th Cir. 1967); Ford Motor Company v. Wallenius…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · January 14, 1987 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …defendants should be \jointly and severally' liable." (Plaintiff's Complaint at pp. 7-8). A case decided in the Michigan Court of Appeals subsequent to Abel is Cousineau v. Ford Motor Company, 140 Mich.App. 19…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 12, 1987 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …by demonstrating defendants' concerted activity, and proximate cause, by demonstrating that defendants' conduct "was so significant and important a cause that \[defendants\] should be legally responsible." Cousineau v. Ford Motor Company, 140 Mich.App. 19, 35…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)

    …mind. Morgan's argument relies on and quotes from Romo v. Ford Motor Co. (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 1115 \[122 Cal.Rptr.2d 139\] (Romo), vacated on other grounds in Ford Motor Co. v. Romo…

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982 · in the opinion

    Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)

    …as indicated by the recent single personal injury jury verdict in the amount of $127.8 million, of which $125 million was for punitive damages. (Richard Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., Superior Court, Santa Ana, Cal.…

  7. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)

    …jury instruction in every duty supported by the facts\[.\]" Id. We believe the trial court satisfied that entitlement with a liability instruction — its Instruction No. 1 — substantively indistinct from that in Ford Motor Co. v. Fulkerson…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · February 17, 1987 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …and alternative liability in Marshall v. Celotex, 651 F.Supp. 389 (E.D.Mich.1987). \[2\] Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 33, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985) ("\[P\]laintiff is entitled…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · July 31, 1986 · in the opinion

    Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …of corporations, is that punitive damages unfairly punish innocent shareholders. This argument has been rejected repeatedly. E.g., Wangen v. Ford Motor Co., 97 Wis.2d 260, 289, 294 N.W.2d 437, 453 (1980); Martin…

  10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion

    Wehmeier v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …Fetzer Co. v. Dile (9th Cir.1981), 643 F.2d 670; Smith v. Ford Motor Co. (10th Cir.1980), 626 F.2d 784.) In Scott, the lower court permitted plaintiff, through previous undisclosed witnesses, to advance…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) ("permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability") (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · August 18, 1988 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co., 418 Mich. 311, 343 N.W.2d 164 (1984), and Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985), cert. denied sub nom. Firestone Tire…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · March 28, 1986

    Roehling v. Nat. Gypsum Co. Gold Bond Bldg. (1986)

    …Huntley Power Station exposure and remanded for trial, but affirmed summary judgment for Celotex and on the DuPont and Ford plant exposures. Circumstantial evidence that the plaintiff worked in the same area, at the same time…

  14. Book · 1931

    Johns-Manville: The Brake Re-Liner's Manual, Fourth Edition (1931)

    …instructions for 1926-31 Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Ford and other cars, and closes with a J-M automotive catalog of moulded and woven brake lining sets, brake blocks and asbestos packings made at Waukegan and Manville.

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · January 31, 1986 · in the opinion

    Knauer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …J. Graham and Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, Md., for defendant H.K. Porter. Donald A. Krach, F. Ford Loker, and Niles, Barton & Wilmer, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Keene Corp. Edward C. Mackie, Glenn W. Trimmer…

  16. Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · April 30, 1993 · in the opinion

    Hogland v. Celotex Corp. (1993)

    …Jr. of Crosby, Saad & Beebe, P.C., Birmingham, for appellee Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. Michael B. Kinnard and J. Ford Little of Baker, Worthington, Crossley, Stansberry & Woolf, Knoxville, TN, for appellees Keene Corp. and Owens-Illinois…