No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

29 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 22, 2022 · in the opinion

    Budd v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2022)

    …compound. Given the differences between smoking an addictive substance and using a particular product in the course of employment, we reject this contention. See Raney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 897 F.2d 94, 96 (2d Cir…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Ann Strobel v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)

    …25 Cal.4th at p. 850), which here is the preponderance of the evidence (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 965 (Rutherford)). "\On appeal "\[w\]e review a grant of summary judgment…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 23, 2022 · in the opinion

    Bader v. Johnson & Johnson (2022)

    …with negligence, product liability, and concealment instructions that incorporated the asbestos-specific standard of proof for causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    …of punitive damages. This Court has previously granted Georgia-Pacific summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages in a similar asbestos action, Covington v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., No. GLR-12-461, 2014 WL 12661857…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 5, 2021 · in the opinion

    Leavitt v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)

    …prejudicial error and affirm. BACKGROUND A. A plaintiff seeking to hold a manufacturer liable for asbestos-related latent injuries must satisfy a two-part causation test. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  6. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · October 24, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rich v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2012)

    …to refutation on cross-examination). This does not render the prejudicial portion of Kirk's deposition dealing with Kaiser Gypsum's products admissible. See Murphy v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 779 F.2d 340, 344 (6th Cir…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion

    Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)

    …A Lite 0% CertainTeed Corp. 5% Pipe Covering/Block Insulation Armstrong, Inc. 0% Owens-Illinois 0% Pittsburg Corning 0% Johns Manville 20% JT Thorpe and Son, Inc. 0% Metalclad Insulation Corp. 0% Refractiories/Castables AP Green…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 12, 2013 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2013)

    …Gypsum Co., 98 Cal. App.4th 1098, 1103, 120 Cal.Rptr.2d 23 (2002) (citations omitted) (citing Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 975-76, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2002 · in the opinion

    McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. (2002)

    …Plaintiffs A threshold issue in asbestos litigation is exposure to the defendant's product. The plaintiff bears the burden of proof on this issue. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 975-976…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)

    …containing CalPortland product. A plaintiff claiming asbestos-related injuries must establish some exposure to the asbestos-containing product or activity for which the defendant is responsible. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion

    Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)

    …asbestos-related cancer cases, the plaintiff may seek to prove causation by establishing years of exposure to multiple manufacturers' asbestos-containing products. In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, the California Supreme…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Saffold v. Bondex International, Inc. (2011)

    …before damages can be allotted to it." (Wilson v. Ritto (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 361, 369; Sparks v Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 478 \[defendant manufacturer of asbestos-containing product "undisputedly…

  13. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · November 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    In re Ltl Management LLC (2021)

    …of Old JJCI's liabilities arising from talc-related claims. Among the limited assets the Debtor owns are a bank account containing approximately $6 million in cash, Old JJCI's rights as payee under a funding…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 1, 2023 · in the opinion

    Chenet v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2023)

    …Judge. APPEAL DISMISSED; CASE REMANDED. Lindsey A. Cheek, THE CHEEK LAW FIRM, 650 Poydras Street, Suite 2310, New Orleans, LA 70130, Lewis Owens Unglesby, Lance C. Unglesby, Adrian M. Simm, Jr., Jamie F. Gontarek, UNGLESBY LAW…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · March 31, 2023 · in the opinion

    In re Ltl Management, LLC (2023)

    …T\]he general expectation of state law and of the Bankruptcy Code ... is that courts respect entity separateness absent compelling circumstances calling equity ... into play." In re Owens Corning, 419 F.3d 195, 211 (3d Cir…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · April 29, 2020 · in the opinion

    Castro v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2020)

    …2) (B) only when the plaintiff contests, or the court questions, the defendant's allegation." Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 89 (2014). Johnson & Johnson thus has satisfied the removal…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · January 30, 2023 · in the opinion

    In re Ltl Management, LLC (2023)

    …T\]he general expectation of state law and of the Bankruptcy Code ... is that courts respect entity separateness absent compelling circumstances calling equity ... into play." In re Owens Corning, 419 F.3d 195, 211 (3d Cir…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Roy v. Colgate Palmolive Co. (2021)

    …Young v. Louge, 660 So. 2d 32, 49 (La. App. 4 Cir. 1995). \[28\] Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118, 123 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2005); See also Pitman v. Crane Co…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Olson v. Brenntag N. AM. Inc. (2019)

    …rely on Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v Ballard (749 So 2d 483 \[Fla 1999\]), in which the Florida Supreme Court affirmed a punitive-damages award based in part on post-injury statements by Owens-Corning and…

  20. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    N RE Ltl Management, LLC (2022)

    …Id. Thus, the Original TCC's reliance on Federal-Mogul does not alter this Court's conclusion with respect to subject matter jurisdiction. \[8\] Citing In re Owens Corning, 419 F.3d 195, 212 (3d Cir…