- Organization: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
- Organization: Colgate-Palmolive Co.
- Clear filters
5 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 3, 2018
Hooper-Lynch v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…New York, transacts business here with an articulable nexus to the claim, supporting specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1) even though there is no general jurisdiction. Personal Jurisdiction user of cosmetic talc powder 1968-1985
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 22, 2016
Feinberg v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)
… plaintiffs had not excluded other possible causes; its talc was asbestos-free; and there was no proof of general or specific causation. The court denied the motion. Whether her earlier chest pain and pleural effusions were…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Feinberg v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2012)
…June 2, 2011. \[3\] 21 U.S.C.A. § 379s, entitled "Preemption for labeling or packaging of cosmetics," provides: (a) In general. Except as provided in subsection (b), (d), or (e) of this section, no State…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · October 28, 2021 · in the opinion
Johnson & Johnson v. Shiver (2021)
…limitation could prompt unimpaired claimants to bring suit to protect their ability to recover.\[5\] The General Assembly explicitly stated that the purpose of the Act was to give priority to claimants who could demonstrate actual…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 1, 2023 · in the opinion
Chenet v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2023)
…misplaced. Unlike in Thomas, the trial court judge made only a general statement regarding potential appellate court reversal —the trial court commented that this court had reversed his prior decisions in other unrelated cases. Likewise, the…