No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

77 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 4

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 13, 1995

    Higgins v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The Appellate Division reversed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and remanded for a new trial in favor of plaintiff Higgins, and dismissed Owens-Corning's cross appeal on the medical monitoring award as moot. A…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 14, 1990

    Owens Corning Fiberglas v. Ind. Comm'n (1990)

    …Charlotte Hammond, against Owens Corning Fiberglas and denied Owens Corning credit for her loss of consortium recovery. Under section 7 of the Workers' Occupational Diseases Act, a widow has an independent cause of action for death…

  3. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995

    Schiavo v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The Appellate Division affirmed the compensatory and punitive damage awards against Owens-Corning in favor of the Schiavo plaintiffs, finding the Saranac document error harmless given the small punitive award. A 'day in the life' videotape…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 2, 1993

    Zenson v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1993)

    The court granted Garlock's motion for a directed verdict and Owens Corning Fiberglas's motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of plaintiff's case, ruling for the defendants because plaintiff…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 9, 1981

    Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1981)

    …Keene, Armstrong Cork, Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois and the third-party defendants, holding that the Wisconsin limitations period runs from the plaintiff's last exposure to any asbestos-containing product, and it set a schedule for…

  6. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995

    Ripa v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The appellate court affirmed liability and compensatory damages for plaintiff Pauline Ripa against Owens-Corning, but cut Owens-Corning's share to thirty percent and reversed the $5.5 million punitive award, remanding for a new…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990

    Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)

    Six longtime workers at the E.I. du Pont plant in Clinton, Iowa, and their wives sued makers of asbestos insulation products. The workers said they were exposed through insulation on pipes and boilers, and in some cases through cleaning out machine…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · June 15, 1998

    Consorti v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (In Re Joint Eastern and Southern Dist. Asbestos, 1998)

    The court granted Owens Corning's motion for a new trial unless Consorti accepts a reduced pain and suffering award of $5 million (a $7 million remittitur), and denied Owens Corning's request to cut the…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 31, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Baltimore City (1996)

    The Court of Special Appeals reversed the $2,600,000 punitive damages award against Owens-Corning for lack of proof of actual knowledge, affirmed the compensatory award for the City of Baltimore, and rejected the juror…

  10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 11, 1998

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    The appellate court affirmed the jury verdicts for plaintiffs Bicknell, Thacker and McClure against Owens Corning Fiberglas and (in McClure) Owens-Illinois, and remanded only so the trial court could apply setoffs for settlements with other…

  11. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 21, 1999

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …and ordered judgment entered for Owens Corning and Owens-Illinois because the evidence did not prove a civil conspiracy. Parallel conduct by manufacturers of the same or similar products may be circumstantial evidence of a civil…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · February 27, 1989

    Fisher v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1989)

    Charles Fisher and his wife sued several asbestos product companies in 1985, claiming his exposure to asbestos had caused asbestosis, cancer, and possibly mesothelioma. The parties settled for $60,000, and the Fishers signed a release of all claims,…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · August 24, 1998

    Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    Gerald Feidt and his wife sued several companies in New Jersey state court, including Westinghouse (later renamed CBS), over his mesothelioma. He alleged he was exposed to asbestos while working aboard the U.S.S. Enterprise at the Newport News…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 1998

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    Evelyn Ruckstuhl and her husband Richard sued several companies in Louisiana state court. They alleged she was diagnosed with mesothelioma in March 1996 from asbestos exposure in two ways: dust on her husband's work clothes from the Baton Rouge…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 20, 1981

    Carbonaro v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

    The federal court granted Owens-Corning Fiberglas's motion for summary judgment, holding the plaintiffs' asbestos suit barred by the prior state-court judgment for the defendants, so the plaintiffs lost. Under claim preclusion, a final…

  16. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · August 1, 1989

    Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1989)

    Roger Mauro and his wife sued several asbestos product makers. Mauro had worked as a repairman and then a plumber-steamfitter at Ancora State Psychiatric Hospital from 1964 into the late 1970s. He tore out old insulation and installed new, using or…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995

    Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)

    …judgment for plaintiff Sarah Kirk against Owens-Corning and remanded for a new trial on damages and liability, because the district court refused to strike two biased jurors for cause, impairing Owens-Corning's peremptory challenges…

  18. Court case · North Carolina Supreme Court · November 5, 1985

    Wilder v. Amatex Corp. (1985)

    The North Carolina Supreme Court reversed the summary judgments for Owens-Corning and for the other defendant appellees, ruling for plaintiff J.W. Wilder against Owens-Corning, Eagle-Picher, Pittsburgh Corning, Celotex, Keene and Starr-Davis…

  19. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 20, 1994

    Quick v. Murphy Oil Co. (1994)

    The appeals court reversed the $46,000 contribution judgment that the trial court had entered for Owens Corning Fiberglas against Garlock, because Quick's exposure to Garlock's asbestos products was trivial and not a cause…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · November 6, 1992

    Tragarz v. Keene Corp. (1992)

    The Seventh Circuit affirmed the $3,000,000 judgment for Grace Tragarz against Keene and Owens-Corning Fiberglas, but reversed the denial of Keene's request to file a contribution cross-claim against OCF and remanded…