No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · June 15, 2011

    Butler v. Union Carbide Corporation (2011)

    The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's exclusion of Dr. Maddox's specific causation testimony and its grant of summary judgment to Union Carbide, so Mrs. Butler lost. A trial court does not…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 13, 2014

    Armanious v. 3M Co. (2014)

    The court denied Union Carbide Corporation's motion for summary judgment, so the plaintiff estate's claims against it continue, because a jury could infer that Mr. Nilsson was exposed to its Calidria asbestos through National…

  3. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 22, 2012

    Bier v. Am. Biltrite (2012)

    The appeals court affirmed summary judgment for Union Carbide, ruling that Bier's estate had no evidence that the decedent was exposed to Union Carbide's Calidria asbestos. A plaintiff cannot defeat summary judgment against a…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · September 29, 2016

    In re Reed (2016)

    Barbara Reed was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2016 and had her right lung removed. She said she was exposed to asbestos from 1971 to 1976 while working in the Plastics Mold Cleaning and Bakelight Departments at the Square D plant in Cedar Rapids,…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 8, 2010

    Horn v. A.W. Chesterson Co. (In re Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2010)

    Ten asbestos cases, brought by plaintiffs represented by the same law firm, were assigned to one New York County judge for trial. Eight of the plaintiffs, alleging mesothelioma, asked the court to consolidate their cases into three groups for joint…

  6. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · September 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Sharp v. Afc-Holcroft (2010)

    …citations omitted). On such a motion, this Court reviews the evidence and draws all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Credit Union Central Falls v. Groff, 966 A.2d 1262, 1267 …