6 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · January 29, 2020
Joseph v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2020)
…action (a win for Huntington Ingalls and Lamorak against the Joseph children), and remanded for further proceedings. A compromise worded in general terms, releasing present and future occupational lung disease and all other personal injury claims…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · October 21, 1980
Ins. Co. North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations (1980)
…Affiliated FM, Illinois National and Liberty Mutual lost, and Forty-Eight and Travelers largely won. Under standard comprehensive general liability policies, 'bodily injury' from asbestosis occurs when tissue damage begins on inhalation of fibers, not at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Lebeau v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2023)
… to pertain; refer; to bring into association with or connection with.'"\[66\] Unlike the general removal statute, which must be strictly construed in favor of remand, the Federal Officer Removal statute's language must be liberally…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2018)
…These cases are better characterized as standing for the general idea that a deposition can constitute an "other paper" than for actually deciding whether the defendant must remove within thirty days of the testimony or the…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · May 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Penegar v. United Parcel Service (2018)
…employment with defendant-employer. The preponderance of the evidence in view of the entire record establishes that decedent's work for defendant-employer exposed him to a greater risk of contracting mesothelioma over the general public…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…judgment is disfavored when issues of intent or state of mind are involved, plaintiffs fail to consider that this is a general rule. The rule does not preclude this Court from evaluating the merits of such…