No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009

    Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)

    Viking Pump and Warren Pumps bought pump businesses from Houdaille Industries and now face asbestos injury claims from the years Houdaille owned those businesses. They sued twenty excess insurers, who had sold Houdaille forty-five policies, to use…

  2. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · September 12, 2016

    In re Viking Pump, Inc. (2016)

    Viking Pump and Warren Pumps make pumps. Both bought their businesses from Houdaille Industries in the 1980s and then faced asbestos personal injury claims from the period when Houdaille owned them. They sued the excess insurers that had sold…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 4, 2013

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    John Crane, Inc., which made asbestos-containing gaskets before 1986, has been named in over 250,000 asbestos bodily injury claims. It sued its umbrella and excess insurers (CNA, Allianz, TIG and AIG-related companies) for a declaration of their…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 through 400, Defendants, (Allianz Underwriters Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, AIU Insurance Company, American Re-Insurance Company, Granite State Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company, National Surety Corporation, National Union Fire…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Hopeman Brothers, Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co. (2018)

    …Viking Pump (NY), at 257, 33 N.Y.S.3d 118, 52 N.E.3d 1144 (quoting Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 21 N.Y.3d…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (2021)

    …such judicial involvement derives from Covil's status as a dissolved corporation in receivership and does not entitle the Zurich Settlement to absolute protection from production in litigation.\[8\] Allowing for limited disclosure under the circumstances…