No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

20 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · October 28, 1981

    Fearson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)

    Rita Fearson, as administratrix, sued Johns-Manville and other asbestos product companies after her husband Joseph Fearson died of lung cancer in 1979 at age 57. He had worked as an asbestos insulation installer in the District of Columbia from 1936…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · July 30, 1982

    Wilson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    Henry Wilson worked as an insulation worker at construction sites in the Washington, D.C. area from 1941. In February 1973 an x-ray showed he had mild asbestosis. In February 1978 he was diagnosed with mesothelioma, and he died in May 1978. In May…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · January 11, 1982

    Bertrand v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    Eugene Bertrand, an insulator, sued Johns-Manville and many other asbestos product makers in federal court in Minnesota. He said he breathed asbestos dust while working with and near asbestos products and developed pulmonary fibrosis and other lung…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 1982 · in the opinion

    Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    …Insulating, UNARCO Industries, Nicolette, and Celotex. Six of the present appellants were parties to Borel: Pittsburgh Corning, Armstrong Cork, Phillip Carey, Ruberoid, Johns-Manville, and Fibreboard Paper. Owens Corning Fiberglass, Standard Asbestos Mfg. & Insulating, UNARCO, and…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 2, 2016 · in the opinion

    Weis v. Dsm Copolymer, Inc. (2016)

    …is improper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(2). See Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F.Supp.2d 653, 670 (E.D.Tex.1999). Accordingly, the court will focus its analysis of…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · May 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)

    …Plaintiffs' more specific requests regarding asbestos or that such generalized requests are proportional to the needs of the case at this juncture. Plaintiffs assert that Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 878 So.2d 631 (La…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · April 25, 2017

    Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)

    The family of William D. Coleman sued Anco Insulations, Pilkington North America (formerly Libbey Owens Ford) and several insurers. They alleged that Coleman died of malignant mesothelioma on November 8, 2016, from exposure to dust and…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · April 21, 2017

    Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)

    William D. Coleman sued Anco Insulations and other defendants in a case removed to federal court in Louisiana. He died of malignant mesothelioma on November 8, 2016. His widow, Pamela Coleman, and his daughter, Jody Coleman Nolte, asked to be…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · March 13, 1981

    Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)

    This opinion covers fifty-seven consolidated asbestos cases in the Marshall division of the Eastern District of Texas. The plaintiffs included insulation workers, pipefitters, carpenters and factory workers, and the defendants were asbestos product…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 11, 1986

    Vigiolto v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    Antoinette Vigiolto sued several asbestos product manufacturers after her husband, Christopher Vigiolto, died of pleural mesothelioma in 1981. He served in the Navy from 1943 to 1945 on two ships, and she alleged he inhaled asbestos dust and fibers…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)

    …the reasons discussed below, we conclude that that cause should be characterized as the continuing process of the manufacture and sale of asbestos containing products. On point again is Owens-Illinois Inc. v. United Insurance Co…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion

    Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

    …the trial court's method of apportionment is not challenged on appeal, we find no error in the decision to hold each policy responsible in full subject to such apportionment.\[17\] (See also Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 30, 2017

    Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2017)

    …a workers' compensation insurer that inspects its insured's workplace owes no duty to the insured's employees for workplace safety where the policy language permits but does not require inspections and disclaims any undertaking for…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · September 16, 1987

    Eagle-Picher Industries v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. (1987)

    …diagnosis date, but the insurer may rebut it in individual cases with clear and convincing medical evidence. Under Ohio law, the insurer owes interest from the time the judgment becomes final. Choice of Law; Insurance Coverage

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 4, 1978

    Ins. Co. of No. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations (1978)

    …during a claimant's exposure must share indemnity and defense costs by years of coverage. Forty-Eight must bear shares for years it was uninsured, and no insurer owes more than the highest single-year limit.

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)

    …than one insurer will be triggered. Because each insurer is fully liable, and because Keene cannot collect more than it owes in damages, the issue of dividing insurance obligations arises. The only logical resolution of this…

  17. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    Lamorak Ins. Co. v. Kone, Inc. (2018)

    …to Kone for 1977 to 1985 count as excess insurance, and Lamorak owes nothing on those policies until Kone exhausts the limits of all applicable primary insurance. We must decide whether the Lamorak policies at issue…

  18. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 29, 2023 · in the opinion

    Barker v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)

    …1973). These elements are: The principal or employer owes a duty of care to the third person (which in this sense includes a co-employee), breach of which has caused the damage for which recovery is…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 15, 2022 · in the opinion

    Stansbury v. McCARTY Corporation (2022)

    …liability for injuries it caused to plaintiff). Accordingly, plaintiff has alleged that Hopeman Brothers owes a duty of care to plaintiff, the breach of which has caused the damage for which recovery is sought. See Ford…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 13, 2024 · in the opinion

    Hotard v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2024)

    …Next, the Court addresses Hopeman Interests' motion for declaratory judgment. In that motion, they seek a judicial declaration that Hotard owes Hopeman Interests a duty of defense/indemnity pursuant to their agreement discussed above. R. Doc…