No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

21 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · May 18, 2016

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …and granted summary judgment to General Electric on all of the Arbogasts' claims against it. A plaintiff must offer evidence from which a jury can reasonably infer that a defendant's product actually contained asbestos before…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003

    Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)

    …Wheeler, Aurora Pump, Gulf Engineering, Ingersoll Rand, Walworth, Crosby Valve, General Electric, Warren Pumps, Crane, A.W. Chesterton and Coffin Turbo Pump, and dismissed Lindstrom's claims against them with prejudice. Under maritime product liability law…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 17, 2011 · in the opinion

    Kiser v. AW Chesterton Co. (2011)

    …Plaintiff argues that either Virginia's General Assembly was aware of what Plaintiff sees as a national trend in favor of adoption of the separate disease rule and embodied this trend when it amended Virginia's…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 16, 2016

    George v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …County state court. Even assuming consent-by-registration survives Daimler, Pennsylvania's registration statute limits general jurisdiction to acts occurring during the period of registration, so a registration that began after the alleged injury does not…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2019

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)

    …Worksites: General Electric building, 32nd and Chestnut Streets; USS Cambria; General Electric building at 32nd and Chestnut Streets, Philadelphia Navy service aboard the USS Cambria USS Cambria 1964-1967; worked at General Electric property General Electric…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia · April 20, 2009 · in the opinion

    Hamrick v. A & I Company (2009)

    …a Durametallic Corp. and GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC f/k/a Garlock, Inc. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and GOODRICH CORPORATION and as successor-in-interest to Goodrich-Gulf Chemical, Inc. f/k/a…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · April 12, 2019 · in the opinion

    Barrett v. AW Chesterton Co. (2019)

    …Schneider Electric USA, Inc., Individually and as Successor in Interest to Electric Controller and Manufacturing Co., Defendants, represented by Neil Joseph MacDonald, MacDonald Law Group, LLC & Rachelle A. Schofield, MacDonald Law Group, LLC. General Electric Company…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Brown v. the Boeing Company (2012)

    …under submission. DONE and ORDERED. \[1\] Plaintiff's complaint also named CBS Corporation (f/k/a Viacom, Inc.), DAP Products, Inc., General Electric Company, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, RT Vanderbilt Company…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kruse v. Actuant Corporation (2020)

    … 3.) After his military service, Mr. Jimenez was "honorably discharged as the civilian equivalent of a Certified Aircraft Electrical Mechanic and Technician." (Id.) Apart from his service, Mr. Jimenez also "performed both supervisorial and hands-on…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · March 31, 2021

    LaFRENTZ v. Lockheed Martin Corporation (2021)

    The court denied 3M and General Dynamics' request for an adverse inference jury instruction for spoliation, but granted a lesser remedy: a limited jury instruction describing the unanswered preservation request and the burial of the lung…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 26, 2016

    Boyd v. Boeing Company (2016)

    The court denied Lockheed Martin's and General Dynamics' motions to reconsider the order allowing plaintiffs to add them as defendants after the amendment deadline, and denied their motion to strike them from the amended complaint…

  12. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013

    Kiser v. AW Chesterton Co. (2013)

    …accrued at the first diagnosis, asbestosis, not the later mesothelioma diagnosis. The court said any change must come from the General Assembly. Two justices dissented. They would have treated mesothelioma as a separate cause of action.

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 9, 2013 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2013)

    …like opposing counsel talking to employees of his clients and that he holds himself to the same standard. He chooses as a general rule not to speak to employees of opposing counsel's clients. July 15…

  14. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 23, 2009 · in the opinion

    Newinski v. John Crane, Inc. (2009)

    …1981) (citations omitted). An exception to the general rule of joint and several liability applies when there are "independent consecutive acts of negligence and it is reasonably possible to determine which injuries were caused by which…

  15. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · April 26, 1999 · in the opinion

    Holmes v. ACandS, Inc. (1999)

    …year discovery based statute of limitations applicable to product liability claims. The comprehensiveness of the medical malpractice act is evidence of the legislature's intent that it should prevail over the more general wrongful death statute…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 18, 2016 · in the opinion

    DePriest v. Crane Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)

    …Here, the evidence that plaintiffs' medical experts intend to submit has the potential to sufficiently establish a general connection between asbestos and mesothelioma, as well as a scientific expression of plaintiffs' exposure levels based on Stagnito…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Webb v. 3M Company (2022)

    …Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir. 2000). But unlike the general removal statute, the Court must broadly construe the federal officer removal statute in favor of a federal forum. Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp.…

  18. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 12, 2010 · in the opinion

    Connell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2010)

    …objects to the purported admission of answers to interrogatories of General Motors Corporation. Appellee did not offer into evidence, and the trial judge did not allow into evidence, any answers to interrogatories of General Motors Corporation…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    Lovaglio v. AW Chesterton Co. (2012)

    …to obtain cross-examination is in any sense attributable to the cross-examiner's own consent or fault, the lack of cross-examination is of course no objection — according to the general principle... that an opportunity…

  20. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Howard v. AW Chesterton Co. (2013)

    …reports in asbestos cases must contain a discussion of the methodology supporting the expert opinion. There are enough nuances pertaining to this subject that we are unable to make such a general pronouncement here. We recognize…