No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 9, 2015

    Thomasson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)

    …Trane, FMC, General Electric, Foster Wheeler and CBS) against plaintiff Claire Thomasson, and denied MetLife's motion to dismiss without prejudice while allowing 45 days of added discovery. To recover in an asbestos case under New…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · February 25, 2019

    Harris v. CBS Corporation (2019)

    Michael Roy Harris and his wife Elsie sued CBS Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand (IR) and other companies in California state court in Alameda County. They brought personal injury and loss of consortium claims. Michael Harris has malignant mesothelioma,…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · October 3, 2017

    Devries v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2017)

    Roberta Devries and Shirley McAfee, widows of two deceased Navy veterans, sued several equipment manufacturers in Pennsylvania state court. They alleged their husbands contracted cancer from asbestos exposure on Navy ships, and in McAfee's case the…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 16, 2016

    George v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …County state court. Even assuming consent-by-registration survives Daimler, Pennsylvania's registration statute limits general jurisdiction to acts occurring during the period of registration, so a registration that began after the alleged injury does not…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2019

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)

    …Worksites: General Electric building, 32nd and Chestnut Streets; USS Cambria; General Electric building at 32nd and Chestnut Streets, Philadelphia Navy service aboard the USS Cambria USS Cambria 1964-1967; worked at General Electric property General Electric…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia · April 20, 2009 · in the opinion

    Hamrick v. A & I Company (2009)

    …a Durametallic Corp. and GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC f/k/a Garlock, Inc. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and GOODRICH CORPORATION and as successor-in-interest to Goodrich-Gulf Chemical, Inc. f/k/a…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Brown v. the Boeing Company (2012)

    …under submission. DONE and ORDERED. \[1\] Plaintiff's complaint also named CBS Corporation (f/k/a Viacom, Inc.), DAP Products, Inc., General Electric Company, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, RT Vanderbilt Company…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kruse v. Actuant Corporation (2020)

    … 3.) After his military service, Mr. Jimenez was "honorably discharged as the civilian equivalent of a Certified Aircraft Electrical Mechanic and Technician." (Id.) Apart from his service, Mr. Jimenez also "performed both supervisorial and hands-on…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · March 31, 2021

    LaFRENTZ v. Lockheed Martin Corporation (2021)

    The court denied 3M and General Dynamics' request for an adverse inference jury instruction for spoliation, but granted a lesser remedy: a limited jury instruction describing the unanswered preservation request and the burial of the lung…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 26, 2016

    Boyd v. Boeing Company (2016)

    The court denied Lockheed Martin's and General Dynamics' motions to reconsider the order allowing plaintiffs to add them as defendants after the amendment deadline, and denied their motion to strike them from the amended complaint…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 9, 2013 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2013)

    …like opposing counsel talking to employees of his clients and that he holds himself to the same standard. He chooses as a general rule not to speak to employees of opposing counsel's clients. July 15…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Webb v. 3M Company (2022)

    …Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir. 2000). But unlike the general removal statute, the Court must broadly construe the federal officer removal statute in favor of a federal forum. Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp.…

  13. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 12, 2010 · in the opinion

    Connell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2010)

    …objects to the purported admission of answers to interrogatories of General Motors Corporation. Appellee did not offer into evidence, and the trial judge did not allow into evidence, any answers to interrogatories of General Motors Corporation…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion

    Thrash v. Cirrus Enterprises, LLC (2017)

    …749 F.3d 1117, 1122 (9th Cir. 2014) ("We recognize that defendants enjoy much broader removal rights under the federal officer removal statute than they do under the general removal statute\[.\]"); Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp…